436 QUOTES by and about Jews ... Part Four of Six.
(Compiled by Willie Martin)

I found it at... "http://ra.nilenet.com/~tmw/files/436quote.html"

 261). "The mode of government which is the most propitious
for the full development of the  class war, is the demagogic
regime which is equally favorable to the two fold intrigues of
Finance and Revolution. When this struggle is let loose in a
violent form, the leaders of the  masses are kings, but money is
god: the demagogues are the masters of the passions of the mob,
but the financiers are the master of the demagogues, and it is
in the last resort the widely spread  riches of the country,
rural property, real estate, which, for as long as they last,
must pay for  the movement.
     When the demagogues prosper amongst the ruins of social and
political order, and  overthrown traditions, gold is the only
power which counts, it is the measure of everything; it  can do
everything and reigns without hindrance in opposition to all
countries, to the detriment  of the city of the nation, or of
the empire which are finally ruined.
     In doing this do not financiers work against themselves? It
may be asked: in destroying the  established order do not they
destroy the source of all riches? This is perhaps true in the
end;  but whilst states which count their years by human
generations, are obliged in order to insure  their existence to
conceive and conduct a farsighted policy in view of a distant
future, Finance  which gets its living from what is present and
tangible, always follows a shortsighted policy,  in view of
rapid results and success without troubling itself about the
morrows of history." (G.  Batault, Le probleme juif, p. 257; The
Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De  Poncins,
pp. 135136)

     262). "From the strictly financial point of view, the most
disastrous events of history, wars  or revolutions, never
produce catastrophes, the manipulators of money can make profit
out of  everything provided that they are wellinformed
beforehand...It is certain that the Jews scattered  over the
whole surface of the globe are particularly well placed in this
respect." (G. Batault, Le  probleme juif; The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 136)

     263). The Jew Weininger, has explained why so many Jews are
communists: "Communism  is not only a national belief but it
implies the giving up of real property especially of landed
property, and the Jews, being international, have never acquired
the taste for real property. They  prefer money, which is an
instrument of power." (The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 137)

     264). "The socialist intellectual may write of the beauties
of nationalization, of the joy of  working for the common good
without hope of personal gain: the revolutionary working man
sees nothing to attract him in all this. Question him on his
ideas of social transformation, and  he will generally express
himself in favor of some method by which he will acquire
somethinghe has not got; he does not want to see the rich man's
car socialized by the state, he wants to  drive about in it
himself. The revolutionary working man is thus in reality not a
socialist but an  anarchist at heart. Nor in some cases is this
unnatural. That the man who enjoys none of the  good things of
life should wish to snatch his share must at least appear
comprehensible. What  is not comprehensible is that he should
wish to renounce all hope of ever possessing anything."  (N.H.
Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movement, p. 327; The
Secret Powers Behind  Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p.
138)

     265). "RUSSIA WAS THE ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN WHICH
THE  DIRECTING CLASS OPPOSED AN ORGANIZED RESISTANCE TO
UNIVERSAL  JUDAISM. At the head of the state was an autocrat
beyond the reach of parliamentary pressure;  the high officials
were independent, rich, and so saturated with religious
(Christian) and political  traditions that Jewish capital, with
a few rare exceptions, had no influence on them. Jews were  not
admitted in the services of the state in judiciary functions or
in the army. The directing class  was independent of Jewish
capital because it owned great riches in lands and forest.
Russia  possessed wheat in abundance and continually renewed her
provision of gold from the mines of  the Urals and Siberia. The
metal supply of the state comprised four thousand million marks
without including the accumulated riches of the Imperial family,
of the monasteries and of  private properties. In spite of her
relatively little developed industry, Russia was able to live
self  supporting. All these economic conditions rendered it
almost impossible for Russia to be made  the slave of
international Jewish capital by the means which had succeeded in
Western Europe.
     If we add moreover that Russia was always the abode of the
religious and conservative  principles of the world, that, with
the aid of her army she had crushed all serious revolutionary
movements and that she did not permit any secret political
societies on her territory, it will be  understood, why world
Jewry, was obliged to march to the attack of the Russian
Empire." (A.  Rosenbert in the Weltkampf, July 1, 1924; The
Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte  Leon De Poncins, p.
139)

     266). "BOLSHEVISM (Judaism), this symbol of chaos and of
the spirit of destruction, IS  ABOVE ALL AN ANTICHRISTIAN and
antisocial CONCEPTION. This present destructive  tendency is
clearly advantageous for only one national and religious entity:
Judaism. The fact that  Jews are the most active element in
present day revolutions as well as in revolutionary socialism,
that they draw to themselves the power forced form the peoples
of other nations by revolution,  is a fact in itself,
independent of the question of knowing if that comes from
organized  worldwide Judaism, from Jewish Free Masonry or by an
elementary evolution brought about  by Jewish national
solidarity and the accumulation of the capital in the hands of
Jewish bankers.
     The contest is becoming more definite. The domination of
revolutionary Judaism in Russia  and the open support given to
this Jewish Bolshevism by Judaism the world over finally clear
up  the situation, show the cards and put the question of the
battle of Christianity against Judaism,  of the National State
against the International, that is to say, in reality, against
Jewish world  power." (Weltkampf, July 1924, p. 21; The Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon  De Poncins, p. 140).


     267). "There is little resemblance between the mystical and
undecided Slav, the violent but  traditionliving Magyar, and the
heavy deliberate German. And yet Bolshevism wove the same  web
over them all, by the same means and with the same tokens. The
national temperament of  the three races does not the least
reveal itself in the terrible conceptions which have been
accomplished, in complete agreement, by men of the same
mentality in Moscow, Buda Pesth,  and Munich.
     From the very beginning of the dissolution in Russia,
Kerensky was on the spot, then came  Trotsky, on watch, in the
shadow of Lenin. When Hungary was fainting, weak from loss of
blood, Kunfi, Jaszi and Pogany were waiting behind Karolyi, and
behind them came Bela Hun  and his Staff. And when Bavaria
tottered Kurt Eisner was ready to produce the first act of the
revolution. In the second act it was Max Lieven (Levy) who
proclaimed the Dictatorship of the  Proletariat at Munich, a
further edition of Russian and Hungarian Bolshevism.
     So great are the specific differences between the three
races that the mysterious similarity  of these events cannot be
due to any analogy between them, but only to the work of a
fourth race  living amongst the others but unmingled with them.
     Among modern nations with their short memories, the Jewish
people...Whether despised or  feared it remains an eternal
stranger. it comes without invitation and remains even when
driven  out. It is scattered and yet coherent. It takes up its
abode in the very body of the nations. It  creates laws beyond
and above the laws. It denies the idea of a homeland but it
possesses its own  homeland which it carries along with it and
establishes wherever it goes. It denies the god of  other
peoples and everywhere rebuilds the temple. It complains of its
isolation, and by  mysterious channels it links together the
parts of the infinite New Jerusalem which covers the  whole
universe. It has connections and ties everywhere, which explains
how capital and the  Press, concentrated in its hands, conserve
the same designs in every country of the world, and  the
interests of the race which are identical in Ruthenian villages
and in the City of New York;  if it extols someone he is
glorified all over the world, and if it wishes to ruin someone
the work  of destruction is carried out as if directed by a
single hand.
     THE ORDERS COME FROM THE DEPTHS OF MYSTERIOUS DARKNESS.
That which  the Jew jeers at and destroys among other peoples,
it fanatically preserves in the bosom of  Judaism. If it teaches
revolt and anarchy to others, it in itself shows admirable
OBEDIENCE TO  ITS INVISIBLE GUIDES
     In the time of the Turkish revolution, a Jew said proudly
to my father: 'It is we who are  making it, we, the Young Turks,
the Jews.' During the Portuguese revolution, I heard the
Marquis de Vasconcellos, Portuguese ambassador at Rome, say 'The
Jews and the Free Masons  are directing the revolution in
Lisbon.' Today when the greater part of Europe is given up to
the  revolution, they are everywhere leading the movement,
according to a single plan. How did they  succeed in concealing
this plan which embraced the whole world and which was not the
work  of a few months or even years? THEY USED AS A SCREEN MEN
OF EACH COUNTRY,  BLIND, FRIVOLOUS, VENAL, FORWARD, OR STUPID,
AND WHO KNEW NOTHING.  And thus they worked in security, these
redoubtable organizers, these sons of an ancient race  which
knows how to keep a secret. And that is why none of them has
betrayed the others."  (Cecile De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p.
135; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte  Leon De
Poncins, pp. 141143)

     268). "The final goal of world revolution is not socialism,
or even communism, it is not a  change in the present economic
system, it is not the destruction of civilization in a material
sense. The revolution desired by the leaders is moral and
spiritual, it is an anarchy of ideas in  which all the bases
established nineteen centuries ago shall be overthrown, all the
honored  traditions trodden under foot, and, ABOVE ALL, THE
CHRISTIAN IDEAL FINALLY  OBLITERATED." (Nesta Webster, Secret
Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 334; The  Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 143)

     269). "The inward thought of Moscow (the Jews) indeed
appears to be that for twenty  centuries while humanity has been
following Christ, it has been on the wrong word. It is now  high
time to correct this error of direction BY CREATING A NEW MORAL
CODE, A NEW  CIVILIZATION, FOUNDED ON QUITE DIFFERENT PRINCIPLES
(Talmudic Principles).  And it appears that it is this idea
which the communist leaders wished to symbolize when a few
months ago THEY PROPOSED TO ERECT IN MOSCOW A STATUE TO JUDAS
ISCARIOT,  TO JUDAS, THIS GREAT HONEST MISUNDERSTOOD MAN, who
hanged himself, not at  all, as it is usually and foolishly
believed, because of remorse for having sold his master, but
because of despair, poor man, at the thought that humanity would
pay for by innumerable  misfortunes the wrong path which it was
about to follow." (J. and J. Tharaud, Causerie sur  Israel, p.
38; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins, pp. 143144)

     270). "In our decrees, it is definitely proclaimed that
religion is a question for the private  individual; but whilst
opportunists tended to see in these words the meaning that the
state would  adopt the policy of folded arms, the Marxian
revolutionary recognizes the duty of the state to  lead a most
resolute struggle against religion by means of ideological
influences on the  proletarian masses." (The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p.  144)

     271). "The idea of authority, and therefore the respect for
authority, is an antisemitic  notion. It is in Catholicism, IN
CHRISTIANITY, IN THE VERY TEACHINGS OF JESUS  THAT IT FINDS AT
ONCE ITS LAY AND ITS RELIGIOUS CONSECRATION." Kadmi  Cohen, p.
60; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de
Poncins, p. 192)

     272). "In 1923, Trotsky, and Lunatcharsky presided over a
meeting in Moscow organized  by the propaganda section of the
Communist party to judge God. Five thousand men of the Red  Army
were present. The accused was found guilty of various
ignominious acts and having had  the audacity to fail to appear,
he was condemned in default." (Ost Express, January 30, 1923.
Cf. Berliner Taegeblatt May 1, 1923. See the details of the
Bolshevist struggle against religion  in The Assault of Heaven
by A. Valentinoff (Boswell); The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution,  by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 144145)

     273). "There is in existence a plan of world organization
about which much has been said  for several years past, in favor
of which determined propaganda has been made among the  masses,
and towards which our present rulers are causing us to slide
gradually and  unconsciously. We mean to say the socialist
collectivist organization. It is that which is the mostin
harmony with the character, the aptitudes and the means of
action of the Jewish race; it is that  which bears the
signature, the trademark of this new reigning people; it is that
which it wishes  to impose on the Christian world because it is
only by this means that it can dominate the latter.
     Instead of wearing a military or political character, the
dictatorship imposed by the Jewish  race will be a financial
industrial, commercial dictatorship. At least for a time, it
will show itself  as little as possible. The Jews have endowed
the commercial, industrial and financial world with  the
JoinStock Company, thanks to which they are able to hide their
immense riches. They will  endow the entire Christian world with
that which they have bestowed on France: the JointStock  Company
for the exploitation of nations called Republic, thanks to which
they will be able to  hide their kingship.
     We are moving then towards the Universal Republic because
it is only thus that Jewish  financial, industrial and
commercial kingship can be established. But under its republican
mask  this kingship will be infinitely more despotic than any
other. It will be exactly that which man  has established over
the animal. The Jewish race will maintain its hold upon us by
our needs.  It will rely on a strongly organized and carefully
chosen police so generously paid that it will be  ready to do
anything just as the presidents of republics, who are given
twelve hundred thousand  francs and who are chosen especially
for the purpose, are ready to put their signature to  anything.
Beyond the policy, nothing but workmen on one side, and on the
other engineers,  directors, administrators. The workers will be
all the nonJews. The engineers, directors and  administrators
will, on the contrary, be Jews; we do not say the Jews and their
friends; we say,  the Jews; for the Jews then will have no more
friends. And they will be a hundred times right,  in such a
situation, to rely only upon those who will be of the 'Race.'
This may all seem  impossible to us; and nevertheless it will
come about in the most natural way in the world,  because
everything will have been prepared secretly, as the (French and
Russian) revolution was.       In the most natural way in the
world, we say, in this sense that there must always be
engineers, directors and administrators so that the human flock
may work and live and that,  furthermore, the reorganization of
the world which we shall have disorganized cannot be  operated
savvy by those who will have previously gathered in wealth
everywhere.
     By reason of this privileged situation, which we are
allowing to become established for their  benefit, the Jews
alone will be in a position to direct everything. The peoples
will put their hand  to the wheel to bring about this state of
things, they will collaborate in the destruction of all  other
power than that of the State as long as they are allowed to
believe that the State, this State  which possesses all, is
themselves.
     They will not cease to work for their own servitude until
the day when the Jews will say to  them: 'We beg your pardon!
You have not understood. The State, this State which owns
everything, is not you, it is us!' The people then will wish to
resist. But it will be too late to  prevent it, because ALL
MORAL FORCES HAVING CEASED TO EXIST, all material forces  will
have been shattered by that same cause. Sheep do not resist the
sheepdog trained to drive  them and possessing strong jaws. All
that the working class could do, would be to refuse to  work.
The Jews are not simpletons enough not to foresee that. They
will have provisions for  themselves and for their watchdogs.
They will allow famine to subdue resistance. If the need  should
arise they would have no scruple in hurling on the people,
mutinous BUT UNARMED,  THEIR POLICE MADE INVINCIBLE BECAUSE THEY
WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE  MOST UP TO DATE WEAPONS AGAINST
POWERLESS MOBS. Have we not already avision of the invincibility
of organized forces against the crowd (remember Tenamin Square
in  China).
     France has known, and she has not forgotten the rule of the
Masonic Terror. She will know,  and the world will know with her
THE RULE OF THE JEWISH TERROR." (Copin Albancelli,  La
conjuration juive contre les peuples. E. Vitte, Lyon, 1909, p.
450; The Secret Powers Behind  Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins, pp. 145147)

     274). "The extraordinary Commissions are not a medium of
Justice, but 'OF  EXTERMINATION WITHOUT MERCY' according, to the
expression of the Central  Communist Committee.
     The extraordinary Commission is not a 'Commission of
Enquiry,' nor a Court of Justice,  nor a Tribunal, it decides
for itself its own powers. 'It is a medium of combat which
operates  on the interior front of the Civil War. It does not
judge the enemy but exterminates him. It does  not pardon those
who are on the other side of the barricade, it crushes them.'
     It is not difficult to imagine how this extermination
without mercy operates in reality when,  instead of the 'dead
code of the laws,' there reigns only revolutionary experience
and conscience.  Conscience is subjective and experience must
give place to the pleasure and whims of the judges.
     'We are not making war against individuals in particular,'
writes Latsis (Latsis directed the  Terror in the Ukraine) in
the Red Terror of November 1918. 'WE ARE EXTERMINATING  THE
BOURGEOISIE (middle class) AS A CLASS. Do not look in the
enquiry for documents  and proofs of what the accused person has
done in acts or words against the Soviet Authority.  The first
question which you must put to him is, to what class does he
belong, what are his  origin, his education, his instruction,
his profession.'" (S.P. Melgounov, La terreur rouge en  Russie
de 1918 a 1923. Payot, 1927; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon  De Poncins, pp. 147148)

     275). "Yes, certainly your Russia is dying. There no longer
exists anywhere, if it has ever  existed, a single class of the
population for which life is harder than in our Soviet
paradise...We  make experiments on the living body of the
people, devil take it, exactly like a first year student
working on a corpse of a vagabond which he has procured in the
anatomy operatingtheater.  Read our two constitutions carefully;
it is there frankly indicated that it is not the Soviet Union
nor its parts which interest us, but the struggle against world
capital and the universal revolution  to which we have always
sacrificed everything, to which we are sacrificing the country,
to which  we are sacrificing ourselves. (It is evident that the
sacrifice does not extend to the Zinovieffs)...
     Here, in our country, where we are absolute masters, we
fear no one at all. The country  worn out by wars, sickness,
death and famine (it is a dangerous but splendid means), no
longer  dares to make the slightest protest, finding itself
under the perpetual menace of the Cheka and  the army...
     Often we are ourselves surprised by its patience which has
become so wellknown...there  is not, one can be certain in the
whole of Russia, A SINGLE HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH WE  HAVE NOT KILLED
IN SOME MANNER OR OTHER THE FATHER, THE MOTHER, A  BROTHER, A
DAUGHTER, A SON, SOME NEAR RELATIVE OR FRIEND. Very well then!
Felix (Djerjinsky) nevertheless walks quietly about Moscow
without any guard, even at night...  When we remonstrate with
him for these walks he contents himself with laughing
disdainfullyand saying: 'WHAT! THEY WOULD NEVER DARE' psakrer,
'AND HE IS RIGHT. THEY  DO NOT DARE. What a strange country!"
(Letter from Bukharin to Britain, La Revue  universelle, March
1, 1928; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
 Poncins, p. 149)

     276). "All the cement floor of the great garage (the
execution hall of the departmental  {Jewish} Cheka of Kief) was
flooded with blood. This blood was no longer flowing, it formed
a layer of several inches: it was a horrible mixture of blood,
brains, of pieces of skull, of tufts  of hair and other human
remains. All the walls riddled by thousands of bullets were
bespattered  with blood; pieces of brains and of scalps were
sticking to them.
     A gutter twentyfive centimeters wide by twentyfive
centimeters deep and about ten meters  long ran from the center
of the garage towards a subterranean drain. This gutter along,
its whole  length was full to the top of blood...Usually, as
soon as the massacre had taken place the bodies  were conveyed
out of the town in motor lorries and buried beside the grave
about which we have  spoken; we found in a corner of the garden
another grave which was older and contained about  eighty
bodies. Here we discovered on the bodies traces of cruelty and
mutilations the most varied  and unimaginable. Some bodies were
disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were  literally
hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out and the head,
face, neck and trunk  covered with deep wounds. Further on we
found a corpse with a wedge driven into the chest.  Some had no
tongues. In a corner of the grave we discovered a certain
quantity of arms and  legs..." (Rohrberg, Commission of Enquiry,
August 1919; S.P. Melgounov, La terreur rouge  en Russie. Payot,
1927, p. 161; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte
Leon De  Poncins, pp. 149150)

     277). "During the winter of 1920 the Union of Socialist
Soviet Republics comprised 52  governments with 52 Extraordinary
Commissions (Cheka), 52 special sections and 52  revolutionary
tribunals, Moreover numberless 'EsteChekas,' Chekas for
transport systems,  Chekas for railways, tribunals for troops
for internal security, flying tribunals sent for mass
executions on the spot. To this list of torture chambers the
special sections must be added, 16  army and divisional
tribunals. In all a thousand chambers of torture must be
reckoned, and if we  take into consideration that there existed
at this time cantonal Chekas, we must add even more.
     Since then the number of Soviet Governments has grown:
Siberia, the Crimea, the Far East,  have been conquered. The
number of Chekas has grown in geometrical proportion.
     According to direct data (in 1920, when the Terror had not
diminished and information on  the subject had not been reduced)
it was possible to arrive at a daily average figure for each
tribunal: the curve of executions rises from one to fifty (the
latter figure in the big centers) and  up to one hundred in
regions recently conquered by the Red Army. The crises of Terror
were  periodical, then they ceased, so that it is possible to
establish the (modes) figure of five victims  a day which
multiplied by the number of one thousand tribunals give five
thousand, and about  a million and a half per annum!" (S.P.
Melgounov, p. 104; The Secret Powers Behind  Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 151)

     278). "The Red Terror became so widespread that it is
impossible to give here all the details  of the principal means
employed by the [Jewish] Cheka(s) to master resistance; one of
the mostimportant is that of hostages, taken among all social
classes. These are held responsible for any  antiBolshevist
movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a
village to give its  harvest etc.) and are immediately executed.
Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky,  member of the
Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them
were put to  death, and many of these unfortunate men and women
suffered before death various tortures  inflicted by coldblooded
cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.
     This I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff,
in the presence of the Allied  Missions, immediately after the
Reds had abandoned the town; they consist of a series of ghastly
 reproductions such as: Bodies of three workmen taken as
hostages from a factory which went on  strike. One had his eyes
burnt, his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands
cut off.
     The bodies of hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch,
small landed proprietors, who  were scalped by their
executioners; S. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a
white hot  sword blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former
officer, who had his tongue and one hand cut  off and the skin
torn off from his left leg.
     Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means
of a metallic comb. This  sinister find was the result of a
careful inspection of the cellar of the Extraordinary Commission
 of Kharkoff. The retired general Pontiafa, a hostage who had
the skin of his right hand torn off  and the genital parts
mutilated.
     Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a
drapery business, Mme. A.L.  Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo.
Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and
emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.
     Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle,
Sevenetry, and Sidorfehouk, with  atrociously mutilated faces,
the genital parts having been operated upon by Chinese torturers
in  a manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the
agony caused to the victims must  have been dreadful.
     It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery
which the Red Terror took. A volume  would not contain them. The
Cheka of Kharkoff, for example, in which Saenko operated, had
the specialty of scalping victims and taking off the skin of
their hands as one takes off a  glove...At Voronege the victims
were shut up naked in a barrel studded with nails which was
then rolled about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot
iron FIVE POINTED STAR. At  Tsaritsin and at Kamishin their
bones were sawed...At Keif the victim was shut up in a chest
containing decomposing corpses; after firing shots above his
head his torturers told him that he  would be buried alive. The
chest was buried and opened again half an hour later when the
interrogation of the victim was proceeded with. The scene was
repeated several times over. It  is not surprising that many
victims went mad." (S.P. Melgounov, p. 164166; The Secret Powers
 Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 151153)

     279). "Let us recall that on July 17, 1918 at
Ekaterinenburg, and on the order of the Cheka  (order given by
the Jew Sverdloff from Moscow) the commission of execution
commanded by  the Jew Yourowsky, assassinated by shooting or by
bayoneting the Czar, Czarina, Czarevitch,  the four Grand
Duchesses, Dr. Botkin, the manservant, the womanservant, the
cook and the  dog. The members of the imperial family in closest
succession to the throne were assassinated  in the following
night. The Grand Dukes Mikhailovitch, Constantinovitch, Vladimir
Paley and  the Grand Duchess Elisabeth Feodorovna were thrown
down a well at Alapaievsk, in Siberia.The Grand Duke Michael
Alexandrovitch was assassinated at Perm with his suite.
     Dostoiewsky was not right when he said: 'An odd fancy
sometimes comes into my head:  What would happen in Russia if
instead of three million Jews which are there, there were three
million Russians and eighty million Jews? What would have
happened to these Russians among  the Jews and how would they
have been treated? Would they have been placed on an equal
footing with them? Would they have permitted them to pray
freely? Would they not have simply  made them slaves, or even
worse: would they not have simply flayed the skin from them?
Would  they not have massacred them until completely destroyed,
as they did with other peoples of  antiquity in the times of
their olden history?" (Nicholas Sokoloff, L'enquete judiciaire
sur  l'Assassinat de la famille imperiale. Payot, 1924; The
Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by  Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
pp. 153154)

     280). "How does the civilized world permit such a state of
things to reign over the sixth part  of the globe? If there was
still a monarchy in Russia, it goes without saying that nobody
would  admit it. There would be thundering questions in the
parliaments of the two hemispheres, fiery  protests from all the
leagues of the 'Rights of Man,' articles in the indignant
newspapers, a rapid  and unanimous understanding among all
social classes and a whole series of national, economic,
diplomatic and military measures for the destruction of this
plague. But present day democracy  is much less troubled about
it than about a cold of Macdonald or the broken one of
Carpentier.
     And although the occidental bourgeoisie knows perfectly
well that the Soviet power is its  irreconcilable enemy, with
which no understanding is possible, that moreover, it would be
useless since economically Russia is nothing more than a corpse,
nevertheless the flirtation of  this bourgeoisie with the
Comintern lasts and threatens to become a long romance.
     To this question there is only one answer: as in Western
Europe international Judaism holds  it in its hands political
power as strongly as the Jewish Communists hold it in Russia, it
does all  that is humanly possible to retard the day when the
latter will fall." (Weltkampf, Munich, July  1924; The Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 156).

     281). "In that which concerns the Jews, their part in world
socialism is so important that it  is impossible to pass it over
in silence. Is it not sufficient to recall the names of the
great Jewish  revolutionaries of the 19th and 20th centuries,
Karl Marx, Lassalle, Kurt Eisner, Bela Kuhn,  Trotsky, Leon
Blum, so that the names of the theorists of modern socialism
should at the same  time be mentioned? If it is not possible to
declare Bolshevism, taken as a whole, a Jewish  creation it is
nevertheless true that the Jews have furnished several leaders
to the Marximalist  movement and that in fact they have played a
considerable part in it.
     Jewish tendencies towards communism, apart from all
material collaboration with party  organizations, what a strong
confirmation do they not find in the deep aversion which, a
great  Jew, a great poet, Henry Heine felt for Roman Law! The
subjective causes, the passionate causes  of the revolt of Rabbi
Aquiba and of Bar Kocheba in the year 70 A.D. against the Pax
Romana  and the Jus Romanum, were understood and felt
subjectively and passionately by a Jew of the  19th century who
apparently had maintained no connection with his race!
     Both the Jewish revolutionaries and the Jewish communists
who attack the principle of  private property, of which the most
solid monument is the Codex Juris Civilis of Justinianus, of
Ulpian, etc...are doing nothing different from their ancestors

who resisted Vespasian and Titus.In reality it is the dead who
speak." (Kadmi Kohen: Nomades. F. Alcan, Paris, 1929, p. 26; The
 Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
pp. 157158)

     282). Man can only experience good or evil in this world;
if God wishes to punish or reward  he can only do so during the
life of man. it is therefore here below that the just must
prosper and  the impious suffer." (ibid p. 277; The Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De  Poncins, p. 164)

     283). "It is useless to insist upon the differences which
proceed from this opposition between  the two different views in
the respective attitudes of the pious Jew and the pious
Christian  regarding the acquisition of wealth. While the pious
Christian, who had been guilty of usury,  was tormented on his
deathbed by the tortures of repentance and was ready to give up
all that  he owned, for the possessions unjustly acquired were
scorching his soul, the pious Jews, at the  end of his days
looked with affection upon his coffers and chests filled to the
top with the  accumulated sequins taken during his long life
from poor Christians and even from poor  Moslems; a sight which
could cause his impious heart to rejoice, for every penny of
interest  enclosed therein was like a sacrifice offered to his
God." (Wierner Sombart, Les Juifs et la vie  economique, p. 286;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p.  164)

     284). "Their kingdom is at hand, their perfect kingdom. The
triumph of those ideas is  approaching in the presence of which
the sentiments of humanity are mute, the thirst for truth,  the
Christian and national feelings and even the common pride of the
peoples of Europe. That  which is coming, on the contrary, is
materialism, the blind and grasping appetite for personal
material wellbeing, the thirst for the accumulation of money by
any means; that is all which is  regarded as a higher aim, such
as reason, such as liberty, instead of the Christian ideal of
salvation by the sole means of the close moral and brotherly
union between men. People will  laugh at this, and say that it
does not in the least proceed from the Jews...Was the late James
de  Rothschild of Paris a bad man? We are speaking about Judaism
and the Jewish idea which has  monopolized the whole world,
instead of defective Christianity. A thing will come about which
 nobody can yet even imagine. All this parliamentarism, these
theories regarding the community  which are believed today,
these accumulations of wealth, the banks, science, all that will
collapse  in the winking of an eye and without leaving a trace
behind, except the Jews however, who will  know then what they
have to do, so that even this will be for their gain. All this
is near, close  by...Yes, Europe is on the eve of collapse, a
universal, terrible and general collapse...To me  Bismarck,
Beaconsfield the French Republic, Gambetta and others, are all
only appearances.  Their master, who is the same for every one
else and for the whole of Europe, is the Jew and  his bank. We
shall still see the day when he shall pronounce his veto and
Bismarck will be  unexpectedly swept away like a piece of straw.
Judaism and the banks now reign over all, as  much over Europe
as over education, the whole of civilization and socialism,
especially over  socialism, for with its help Judaism will ROOT
OUT CHRISTIANITY AND DESTROY  CHRISTIAN CULTURE. And if nothing
but anarchy results the Jew will be found directing all;  for
although preaching socialism he will remain nevertheless in his
capacity of Jew along with  the brothers of his race, outside
socialism, and when all the substance of Europe has beenpillaged
only the Jewish bank will subsist." (Fedor Dostoievsky, an 18th
century, citizen who  invented the theorist of a purely economic
conception of the world which rules nearly  everywhere today.
The contemporary political commercialism, business above
everything,  business considered as the supreme aim of human
effort, comes directly from Ricardo. G.  Batault, Le problem
juif, p. 40; Journal d'un ecrivain, 18731876, 1877 editions
Bossard; The  Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon
De Poncins, pp. 165166)

     285). "No traveller has seen a plot of ground ploughed by
Jews, a manufacture created or  supplied by them. In every place
into which they have penetrated they are exclusively given up
the trades of brokers, dealers in second hand goods and usurers,
and the richest amongst them  then become merchants, chandlers
and bankers. The King of Prussia wished to establish them  in
his States and make them citizens; he has been obliged to give
up his idea because he has seen  he would only be multiplying
the class of retailers and usurers. Several Princes of Germany
and  barons of the Empire have summoned them to their states,
thinking to gain from them great  advantages for their commerce;
but the stockjobbing of the Jews and their usury soon brought
into their hands the greater part of the current coin in these
small countries which they  impoverished in the long run."
(Official Report of Baron Malouet to M. de Sartinne on the
demands of the Portuguese Jews in 1776; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte  Leon De Poncins, p. 167)

     286). "It is really time to give up once and for all the
legend according to which the Jews  were obliged during the
European middle ages, and above all 'since the Crusades,' to
devote  themselves to usury because all others professions were
closed to them. The 2000 year old  history of Jewish usury
previous to the Middle ages suffices to indicate the falseness
of this  historic conclusion. But even in that which concerns
the Middle ages and modern times the  statements of official
historiography are far from agreeing with the reality of the
facts. It is not  true that all careers in general were closed
to the Jews during the middle ages and modern times,  but they
preferred to apply themselves to the lending of money on
security. This is what Bucher  has proved for the town of
FrankfortontheMaine, and it is easy to prove it for many other
towns and other countries. Here is irrefutable proof of the
natural tendencies of the Jews for the  trade of moneylenders;
in the Middle ages and later we particularly see governments
striving  to direct the Jews towards other careers without
succeeding." (Warner Sombart, Les Juifs et la  vie economique,
p. 401; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins,  p. 167168)

     287). "Mr. Lawton, in one remark, throws a sidelight on the
moving forces behind the  revolution, which might suggest to him
further investigation as to the origin of what has become  a
world movement. That movement cannot any longer be shrouded by
superficial talk of the  severity of the Russian regime, which
is so favorite an excuse among our Socialists for the most
atrocious action, of the Bolsheviks, who did not come into power
till six months after Tsardom  was ended: I wish to emphasize
the paramount role which the power of money played in bringing
about the Revolution. And here it may not be out of place to
mention that well documented  works have recently been published
in France proving that neither Robespiere nor Danton were
isolated figures upon the revolutionary stage, but that both
were puppets of financial backers...
     When the first revolution broke out Lenin was in Zurich,
where he was financially helped  by an old Swiss merchant, who
later went to Russia to live as a permanent guest of the
Revolution, and some time afterwards disappeared. If Lenin had
not obeyed the orders of his  paymasters how long would he have
remained in the land of the living?" (The Patriot; The  Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp.
168169).

     288). "It may seem amazing to some readers, but it is not
the less a fact that a considerable  number of delegates [to the
Peace Conference at Versailles] believed that the real
influences  behind the AngloSaxon people were Jews...The formula
into which this policy was thrown by  the members of the
conference, whose countries it affected, and who regarded it as
fatal to the  peace of Eastern Europe ends thus: Henceforth the
world will be governed by the AngloSaxon  peoples, who, in turn,
are swayed by their Jewish elements." (Dr. E.J. Dillion, The
inside Story  of the Peace Conference, pp. 496497; The Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon  De Poncins, p. 170)

     289). "An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the
newspapers, can, after half an hour  conversation, tell anyone
what newspaper he reads...even high prelates of Rome, even
Cardinals  Amette and Mercier show themselves more influenced by
the Press of their country than they  themselves probably
realize...often I have noticed that it is according to his
newspaper that one  judges the Papal Bull or the speech of the
Prime Minister." (J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press,  Vienna, 1920;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 171)

     290). "The corruption does not consist in the government
exercising influence on the Press;  such pressure is often
necessary; but in the fact that it is exercised secretly, so
that the public  believes that it is reading a general opinion
when in reality it is a minister who speaks; and the  corruption
of journalism does not consist in its serving the state, but in
its patriotic convictions  being in proportion to the amount of
a subsidy." (Eberle, p. 128, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p.  128;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
173)

     291). "The great telegraphic agencies of the world which
are everywhere the principal source  of news for the Press (just
as wholesale businesses supply the retailers), which spreads far
and  wide that which the world should know or should not know,
and in the form which they wish,  these agencies are either
Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The situation is the
same for  the smaller agencies which supply news to the
newspapers of less importance, the great publicity  agencies
which receive commercial advertisements and which then insert
them in the newspapers  at the price of a large commission for
themselves, are principally in the hands of the Jews; so  are
many provincial newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not
heard directly in the Press,  there comes into play the great
indirect influences, Free Masonry, Finance, etc.
     In many places Jews content themselves with this hidden
influence, just as in economic life  they consider JointStock
companies as the most profitable. The editors may quite well be
Aryans, it is sufficient that in all important questions they
should stand for Jewish interests, or  at least that they should
not oppose them. This is achieved nearly always by the pressure
of  advertisement agencies." Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna,
p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind  Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins, p. 174)

     292). "The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put
everything at a price, artistic fame  as well as success in
business. No intellectual production, no work of art has been
able to see  the light of day and reach public notice, without
passing by the crucible of the Jewish Press,  without having to
submit to its criticism or to pay for its approval. If an artist
should wish to  obtain the approbation of the public, he must of
necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish  journals. If a
young actress, a musician, a singer of talent should wish to
make her first  appearance and to venture before a more of less
numerous audience, she has in most cases not  dared to do so,
unless after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews.
Otherwise she would  experience certain failure. It was despotic
tyranny reestablished, this time for the profit of the  Jews and
brutally exercised by them in all its plentitude.
     Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese Press
dominated by Judaism, has been  absolutely disastrous. It is a
work of death which it has accomplished. Around it and outside
it  all is void. In all the classes of the population are the
germs of hatred, the seeds, of discord and  of jealously,
dissolution and decomposition." F. Trocase, L'Autriche juive,
1898, A. Pierret,  ed., Paris; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175176)

     293). "When I first began to write on Revolution a well
known London Publisher said to me;  'Remember that if you take
an antirevolutionary line you will have the whole literary world
 against you.' This appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the
literary world sympathize with  a movement which, from the
French revolution onwards, has always been directed against
literature, art, and science, and has openly proclaimed its aim
to exalt the manual workers over  the intelligentsia? 'Writers
must be proscribed as the most dangerous enemies of the people'
said  Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said all clever men
should be guillotined. The system of  persecutions against men
of talents was organized...they cried out in the Sections (of
Paris)  'Beware of that man for he has written a book.'
Precisely the same policy has been followed in  Russia under
moderate socialism in Germany the professors, not the 'people,'
are starving in  garrets. Yet the whole Press of our country is
permeated with subversive influences. Not merely  in partisan
works, but in manuals of history or literature for use in
schools, Burke is reproached  for warning us against the French
Revolution and Carlyle's panegyric is applauded. And whilst
every slip on the part of an antirevolutionary writer is seized
on by the critics and held up as  an example of the whole, the
most glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass
unchallenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the
movement. The principle laid  down by Collot d'Herbois still
holds good: 'Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de
 la revolution.'
     All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my
work. I knew that French writers  of the past had distorted
facts to suit their own political views, that conspiracy of
history is still  directed by certain influences in the Masonic
lodges and the Sorbonne [The facilities of literature  and
science of the University of Paris]; I did not know that this
conspiracy was being carried on  in this country. Therefore the
publisher's warning did not daunt me. If I was wrong either in
my  conclusions or facts I was prepared to be challenged. Should
not years of laborious historical  research meet either with
recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?
     But although my book received a great many generous
appreciative reviews in the Press,  criticisms which were
hostile took a form which I had never anticipated. Not a single
honest  attempt was made to refute either my French Revolution
or World Revolution by the usualmethods of controversy;
Statements founded on documentary evidence were met with flat
contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter evidence. In
general the plan adopted was not  to disprove, but to discredit
by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views I
had  never expressed, or even by means of offensive
personalities. It will surely be admitted that this  method of
attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary
controversy." (N.H. Webster,  Secret Societies and Subversive
Movements, London, 1924, Preface; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 179180)

     294). "We have only to look around us in the world today,
to see everywhere the same  disintegrating power at work, in
art, literature, the drama, the daily Press, in every sphere
that  can influence the mind of the public ...our modern cinemas
perpetually endeavor to stir up class  hatred by scenes and
phrases showing 'the injustice of Kings,' 'the sufferings of the
people,' 'the  Selfishness of Aristocrats,' regardless of
whether these enter into the theme of the narrative or  not. And
in the realms of literature, not merely in works of fiction but
in manuals for schools,  in histories and books professing to be
of serious educative value and receiving a skillfully  organized
boom throughout the press, everything is done to weaken
patriotism, to shake belief  in all existing institutions by the
systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts.
 I do not believe that all this is accidental; I do not believe
that he public asks for the anti  patriotic to demoralizing
books and plays placed before it; on the contrary it invariably
responds  to an appeal to patriotism and simple healthy
emotions. The heart of the people is still sound,  but ceaseless
efforts are made to corrupt it." (N.H. Webster, Secret Societies
and Subversive  Movements, p. 342; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp.  180181)

     295). "If this hostility, even aversion, had only been
shown towards the Jews at one period  and in one country, it
would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but
this race has  been on the contrary an object of hatred to all
the peoples among whom it has established itself.  It must be
therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most
diverse races, since they  lived in countries very distant from
each other, since they were ruled by very different laws,
governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same
morals, nor the same customs,  since they were animated by
unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of
anything  in the some way, it must be therefore that the general
cause of antiSemitism has always resided  in Israel itself and
not in those who have fought against Israel." (Bernard Lazare,
L'Antisemitism, The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte
Leon De Poncins, p. 183)

     296). "What virtues and what vices brought upon the Jew
this universal enmity? Why was  he in turn equally maltreated
and hated by the Alexandrians and the Romans, by the Persians
and  the Arabs, by the Turks and by the Christian nations?
BECAUSE EVERYWHERE AND UP TO  THE PRESENT DAY, THE JEW WAS AN
UNSOCIABLE BEING.
     Why was he unsociable? Because he was exclusive and his
exclusiveness was at the same  time political and religious, or,
in other words, he kept to his political, religious cult and his
 law. (B. Lazare, L'Antisemitism, p. 3)


     297). To his unsociability the Jew added exclusiveness.
Without the Law, without Judaism  to practice it, the world
would not exits, God would make it return again into a state of
nothing;  and the world will not know happiness until it is
subjected to the universal empire of that  [Jewish] law, that is
to say, TO THE EMPIRE OF THE JEWS. In consequence the Jewish
people is the people chosen by God as the trustee of his wishes
and desires; it is the only one  with which the Divinity has
made a pact, it is the elected of the Lord...
     This faith in their predestination, in their election,
developed in the Jews an immense pride;  THEY come to LOOK UPON
NONJEWS WITH CONTEMPT AND OFTEN WITH  HATRED, when patriotic
reasons were added to theological ones." (B. Lazare,
L'Antisemitism,  pp. 89; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 184185)

     298). "They [Jews] were always malcontents. I do not mean
to suggest by that they have  been simply faultfinders and
systematic opponents of all government, but the state of things
did  not satisfy them; they were perpetually restless, in the
expectation of a better state which they  never found realized.
Their ideal as not one of those which is satisfied with hope,
they had not  placed it high enough for that, they could not
lull their ambition with dreams and visions. They  believed in
their right to demand immediate satisfactions instead of distant
promises. From this  has sprung the constant agitation of the
Jews.
     The causes which brought about the birth of this agitation,
which maintained and perpetuated  it in the soul of some modern
Jews, are not external causes such as the effective tyranny of a
 prince, of a people, or of a harsh code; they are internal
causes, that is to say, which adhere to  the very essence of the
Hebraic spirit. In the idea of God which the Jews imagined, in
their  conception of life and of death, we must seek for the
reasons of these feelings of revolt with  which they are
animated." (B. Lazare, L'Antisemitism, p. 306; The Secret Powers
Behind  Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 185186)

     299). "When some Jews say that they consider themselves as
a religious sect, like Roman  Catholics or Protestants, they do
not analyze correctly their own attitude and sentiments...Even
if a Jew is baptized or, that which is not necessarily the same
thing, sincerely converted to  Christianity, it is rare if he is
not still regarded as a Jew; his blood, his temperament and his
spiritual particularities remain unchanged." (The Jew and the
Nation, Ad. Lewis, the Zionist  Association of West London; The
Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De  Poncins,
187)

     300). "There is in the destiny of the race, as in the
Semitic character a fixity, a stability, an  immortality which
impress the mind. One might attempt to explain this fixity by
the absence of  mixed marriages, but where could one find the
cause of this repulsion for the woman or man  stranger to the
race? Why this negative duration? There is consanguinity between
the Gaul  described by Julius Caesar and the modern Frenchman,
between the German of Tacitus and the  German of today. A
considerable distance has been traversed between that chapter of
the  'Commentaries' and the plays of Moliere. But if the first
is the bud the second is the full bloom.
     Life, movement, dissimilarities appear in the development
of characters, and their  contemporary form is only the maturity
of an organism which was young several centuries ago,  and
which, in several centuries will reach old age and disappear.
     There is nothing of this among the Semites [here a Jew is
admitting that the Jews are not  Semites]. Like the consonants
of their [again he makes allusion to the fact that the Jews are
not  Semites] language they appear from the dawn of their race
with a clearly defined character, in  spare and needy forms,
neither able to grow larger nor smaller, like a diamond which
can score  other substances but is too hard to be marked by
any." (Kadmi Cohen, Nomades, pp. 115116;  The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 188)

     301). "We Jews had more power than you Americans had during
the War [World War I]."  The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon de Poncins, p. 205)

     302). "The principle of human equality prevents the
creation of social inequalities. Whence  it is clear why neither
Arabs nor the Jews have hereditary nobility; the notion even of
'blue  blood' is lacking. The primary condition for these social
differences would have been the  admission of human inequality;
the contrary principle, is among the Jews, at the base of
everything. The accessory cause of the revolutionary tendencies
in Jewish history resides also in  this extreme doctrine of
equality. How could a State, necessarily organized as a
hierarchy,  subsist if all the men who composed it remained
strictly equal? What strikes us indeed, in Jewish  history is
the almost total lack of organized and lasting State...Endowed
with all qualities  necessary to form politically a nation and a
state, neither Jews nor Arabs have known how to  build up a
definite form of government. The whole political history of
these two peoples is  deeply impregnated with undiscipline. The
whole of Jewish history...is filled at every step with  "popular
movements" of which the material reason eludes us. Even more, in
Europe, during the  19th and 20th centuries the part played by
the Jews IN ALL REVOLUTIONARY  MOVEMENTS IS CONSIDERABLE. And
if, in Russia, previous persecution could perhaps be  made to
explain this participation, it is not at all the same thing in
Hungary, in Bavaria, or  elsewhere. As in Arab history the
explanation of these tendencies must be sought in the domain  of
psychology." (Kadmi Cohen, pp. 7678; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte  Leon de Poncins, pp. 192193)

     303). "It would however be incomplete in this respect if we
did not join to it, cause or  consequence of this state of mind,
the predominance of the idea of Justice. Moreover and the
offset is interesting, it is the idea of Justice, which in
concurrence, with the passionalism of the  race, is at the base
of Jewish revolutionary tendencies. It is by awakening this
sentiment of  justice that one can promote revolutionary
agitation. Social injustice which results from necessary  social
inequality, is however, fruitful: morality may sometimes excuse
it but never justice.
     The doctrine of equality, ideas of justice, and
passionalism decide and form revolutionary  tendencies.
Undiscipline and the absence of belief in authority favors its
development as soon  as the object of the revolutionary tendency
makes its appearance. But the 'object' is possessions:  the
object of human strife, from time immemorial, eternal struggle
for their acquisition and their  repartition. THIS IS COMMUNISM
FIGHTING THE PRINCIPLE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY.
     Even the instinct of property, moreover, the result of
attachment to the soil, does not exist  among the Jews, these
nomads, who have never owned the soil and who have never wished
to  own it. Hence their undeniable communist tendencies from the
days of antiquity." (Kadmi  Cohen, pp. 8185; Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 194195)

     304). "The passionate enthusiasm could take them far, up to
the end: it could decide the  disappearance of the race by a
succession of deadly follies...But this intoxication had its
antidote,  and this disorder of the mind found its corrective in
the conception and practice of a positive  utilitarianism...The
frenzy of the abstractions does not exclude the arithmetic of
interest.  Sometimes straying in Heaven the Jew does not,
nevertheless, lose his belief in the Earth, in his  possessions
and his profits. Quite the contrary! Utilitarianism is the other
pole of the Jewish soul.  All, let us say, in the Jew is
speculation, both of ideas and of business; and in this last
respect,  what a lusty hymn has he not sung to the glorification
of worldly interests! The names of Trotsky  and of Rothschild
mark the extent of the oscillations of the Jewish mind; these
two limits contain  the whole of society, the whole of
civilization of the 20th century." (Kadmi Cohen, pp. 88, 156;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins,
pp. 194195)

     305). "From the ethical standpoint two kinds of Jews are
usually distinguished; the  Portuguese branch and the German
[Khazar; Chazar] branch (Sephardim and Askenazim).
     But from the psychological standpoint there are only two
kinds: the Hassidim and the  Mithnagdim. In the Hassidim we
recognize the Zealots. They are the mystics, the cabalists, the
demoniancs, the enthusiasts, the disinterested, the poets, the
orators, the frantic, the heedless,  the visionaries, the
sensualists. They are the Mediterranean people, they are the
Catholics of  Judaism, of the Catholicism of the best period.
They are the Prophets who held forth like Isaiah  about the time
when the wolf will lie down with the lamb, when swords will be
turned into  plough shares for the plough of Halevy, who sang:
'May my right hand wither if I forget thee  O Jerusalem! May my
tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth if I pronounce not thy
name,' and  who in enthusiastic delirium upon landing in
Palestine kissed the native soil and disdained the  approach of
the barbarian whose lance transfixed him. They are the thousands
and thousands of  unfortunates, Jews of the Ghettos, who during
the Crusades, massacred one another and allowed  themselves to

be massacred...
     The Mithnadgim, are the Utilitarians, the Protestants of
Judaism, the Nordics. Cold,  calculating, egoistic,
positive, they have on their extreme flank vulgar elements,
greedy for gain without scruples,  determined to succeed by hook
or by crook, without pity.
     From the banker, the collected business man, even to the
huckster and the usurer, to  Gobseck and Shylock, they comprise
all the vulgar herd of beings with hard hearts and grasping
hands, who gamble and speculate on the misery, both of
individuals and nations. As soon as a  misfortune occurs they
wish to profit by it; as soon as a scarcity is known they
monopolize the  available goods. Famine is for them an
opportunity for gain. And it is they, when the anti  Semitic
wave sweeps forward, who invoke the great principle of the
solidarity due to the bearers  of the Torch...This distinction
between the two elements, the two opposite extremes of the soul
has always been." (Dadmi Cohen, p. 129130; The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by  Vicomte Leon de Poncins, 195195)

     306). "Judaism presents a unique phenomenon in the annals
of the world, of an indissoluble  alliance, of an intimate
alloy, of a close combination of the religious and national
principles...
     There is not only an ethical difference between Judaism and
all other contemporary religions,  but also a difference in kind
and nature, a fundamental contradiction. We are not face to
facewith a national religion but with a religious nationality."
(G. Batault, Le probleme juif, pp.  6566; The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, 197)

     307). "The idea of God, the image of God, such as it is
reflected in the Bible, goes through  three distinct phases. The
first stage is the Higher Being, thirsty for blood, jealous,
terrible, war  like. The intercourse between the Hebrew and his
God is that of an inferior with s superior  whom he fears and
seeks to appease.
     The second phase the conditions are becoming more equal.
The pact concluded between God  and Abraham develops its
consequences, and the intercourse becomes, so to speak,
according to  stipulation. In the Talmudic Hagada, the
Patriarchs engage in controversies and judicial  arguments with
the Lord. The Tora and the Bible enter into these debate and
their intervention  is preponderant. God pleading against Israel
sometimes loses the lawsuit. The equality of the  contracting
parties is asserted. Finally the third phase the subjectively
divine character of God  is lost. God becomes a kind of
fictitious Being. These very legends, one of which we have just
quoted, for those who know the keen minds of the authors, give
the impression, that THEY, like  their readers, of their
listeners, LOOK UPON GOD IN THE MANNER OF A FICTITIOUS  BEING
AND DIVINITY, AT HEART, FROM THE ANGLE OF A PERSONIFICATION, OF
A SYMBOL OF THE RACE [This religion has a code: THE TALMUD]."
(Kadmi Cohen,  Nomades, p. 138; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, 197198)

     308). "As for the final result of the Messianic revolution
it will always be the same...the  nations will be converted to
Judaism and will obey the law, or else they will be destroyed,
and  the Jews will be the masters of the world." (G. Batault, Le
probleme juif, p. 135; The Secret  Powers Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 203204)

     309). "We shall have Palestine whether you wish it or not.
You can hasten our arrival or  retard it, but it would be better
for you to help us, for, unless you do so, our constructive
power  will be transformed into a destructive power which will
overturn the world." (Judische  Rundschu, No. 7, 1920; See
Rosenberg's, Der Staatsfeindliche Sionismus, The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, p. 205)

     310). "An energetic, lively and extremely haughty people,
considering itself superior to all  other nations, the Jewish
race wished to be a Power. It had an instinctive taste for
domination,  since, by its origin, by its religion, by its
quality of a chosen people which it had always  attributed to
itself [since the Babylonian Captivity], it believed itself
placed above all others. To  exercise this sort of authority the
Jews had not a choice of means, gold gave them a power which
all political and religious laws refuse them, and it was the
only power which they could hope for.  By holding this gold they
became the masters of their masters, they dominated them and
this was  the only way of finding an outlet for their energy and
their activity...The emancipated Jews  entered into the nations
as strangers...They entered into modern societies not as guests
but as  conquerors. They had been like a fencedin herd. Suddenly
the barriers fell and they rushed into  the field which was
opened to them. But they were not warriors...They made the only
conquest  for which they were armed, that economic conquest for
which they had been preparing  themselves for so many
years...The Jew is the living testimony to the disappearance of
the statewhich had as its basis theological principles, a State
which antisemitic Christians dream of  reconstructing. The day
when a Jew occupied an administrative post the Christian State
was in  danger: that is true and the antismites who say that the
Jew has destroyed the idea of the state  could more justly say
that THE ENTRY OF JEWS INTO SOCIETY HAS SYMBOLIZED THE
DESTRUCTION OF THE STATE, THAT IS TO SAY THE CHRISTIAN STATE."
(Bernard  Lazare, L'Antisemitisme, pp. 223, 361; The Secret
Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon  de Poncins, pp.
221222)

     311). "We always come back to the same misunderstanding.
The Jews because of their spirit  of revolt, their exclusiveness
and the Messianic tendencies which animate them are in essence
revolutionaries, but they do not realize it and believe that
they are working for 'progress.'...but  that which they call
justice IS THE TRIUMPH OF JEWISH PRINCIPLES IN THE WORLD  of
which the two extremes are plutocracy and socialism. PRESENT DAY
ANTI SEMITISM  IS A REVOLT AGAINST THE WORLD OF TODAY, THE
PRODUCT OF JUDAISM." (The  Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon de Poncins, p. 225)

     312). "No better title than The World significance of the
Russian Revolution could have been  chosen, for no event in any
age will finally have more significance for our world than this
one.  We are still too near to see clearly this Revolution, this
portentous event, which was certainly  one of the most intimate
and therefore least obvious, aims of the worldconflagration,
hidden as  it was at first by the fire and smoke of national
enthusiasms and patriotic antagonisms.
     You rightly recognize that there is an ideology behind it
and you clearly diagnose it as an  ancient ideology. There is
nothing new under the sun, it is even nothing new that this sun
rises  in the East...For Bolshevism is a religion and a faith.
How could these half converted believers  ever dream to vanquish
the 'Truthful' and the 'Faithful' of their own creed, these holy
crusaders,  who had gathered round the Red Standard of the
Prophet Karl Marx, and who fought under the  daring guidance, of
these experienced officers of all latterday revolutions, the
Jews?
     There is scarcely an even in modern Europe that cannot be
traced back to the Jews...all  latterday ideas and movements
have originally spring from a Jewish source, for the simple
reason, that the Jewish idea has finally conquered and entirely
subdued this only apparently  irreligious universe of ours...
     There is no doubt that the Jews regularly go one better or
worse than the Gentile in whatever  they do, there is no further
doubt that their influence, today justifies a very careful
scrutiny, and  cannot possibly be viewed without serious alarm.
The great question, however, is whether the  Jews are conscious
or unconscious malefactors. I myself am firmly convinced that
they are  unconscious ones, but please do not think that I wish
to exonerate them." (The Secret Powers  Behind Revolution, by
Vicomte Leon de Poncins, p. 226)

     313). "Pharisaism became Talmudism...But THE SPIRIT of the
ANCIENT PHARISEE  SURVIVES UNALTERED. When the Jew...studies the
Talmud, he is actually repeating the  arguments used in the
Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia; from
Babylonia to  North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany;
from these to Poland, Russia and eastern  Europe generally,
ancient Pharisaism has wandered..." (The Pharisees, by Louis
Finkelstein,  Foreword, Vol. 1).

     314). "The Talmud derives its authority from the position
held by the ancient (Pharisee)  academies. The teachers of those
academies, both of Babylonia and of Palestine, were considered
the rightful successors of the older Sanhedrin...At the present
time, the Jewish people have no  living central authority
comparable in status to the ancient Sanhedrins or the later
academies.  Therefore, ANY DECISION REGARDING THE JEWISH
RELIGION MUST BE BASED ON  THE TALMUD AS THE FINAL RESUME OF THE
TEACHING OF THOSE AUTHORITIES  WHEN THEY EXISTED." (The Jews -
Their History, Culture, and Religion, by Rabbi Louis
Finkelstein,

Part Five...of Six.. 315-377

_The ROOT of the NEW WORLD ORDER!