SMYRNA - September 1994





o As Spock would say, "Fascinating!"
o The Reason for "Anti-Semitism" in Russia
o Orthodox Christians and Islam
o Talmudists: World's Worst Bigots
o Back to the New World Order
o SMYRNA's Genesis
o Origin of the Word "Jew"
o Who Were the Judeans
o Jesus Clashed with Judaism
o News and Views
o Marcia Clarke
o Religious News Service
o Forward & "Hate Crimes"
o Haiti
o "Anti-Semitism" on the Internet


The anti-Christ system as described in the Apocalypse of Jesus Christ(1) is developing right on schedule. It is fascinating to watch. Unfortunately, millions of Christians are missing the show because they have been misinformed about the nature and identity of the leadership of the beast system. In the booklet "Strong Delusion" this writer has proved (conclusively, we believe) that Talmudic-Cabalistic Judaism is the woman who is astride the beast of world dominion. The key elements in the evidence are:

1. The location of the headquarters of the woman who guides the beast,(2) and

2. The revival of the beast subsequent to its apparent death.(3)

(1) Commonly known as the Book of the Revelation.

(2) See Rev. 11:8-9.

(3) Rev. 17:8-11.

The reader will need to read "Strong Delusion" for the full discussion. When carefully considered, these two marks of identification fit no other entity than Talmudic-Cabalistic Judaism, and as we watch the scenario unfold, these components increasingly fit into the puzzle and the plot appears to be on schedule. Many misinformed Christians today are making much of the rising "anti-Semitism" in Russia and the satellites states of the former USSR, speculating that the Jews who are now leaving those countries for "Israel" are fulfilling the prophecies of Isa. 43:5-6 and Jer. 16:14-16, and they are calling it "the second great exodus". In three TV broadcasts of The 700 Club Newswatch (6/22-24/94) Pat Robertson's crew did a "documentary" on "anti-Semitism" and Jewish emigration from Russia and its neighbors. A 700 Club "Fact Sheet" mailed to inquirers tells the tale. It states: "Economic chaos and hyper-inflation have impoverished the people... This humiliation is so pervasive that it seems to demand a scapegoat, and an age-old scapegoat is making a comeback: Russian Jews." The 700 Club flyer further states that "anti-Semitism" has a long history in Russia, but of course it doesn't define the term or attempt to explain why. Let us fill in a quick background.

Judeophiles such as 700 Club leaders use (de facto) the definition of "anti-Semitism" used by Jewish leaders, i.e., anti-Semitism is a New Testament dogma that blames the Jews for the death of Christ and for their continued opposition to Christian culture. Therefore, criticism of Jewish beliefs or programs is construed as "anti-Semitic" and all "anti-Semites" are hate-mongers. Furthermore, the media have been so thoroughly saturated with that point of view that any mention of the term conjures up images of Nazism, bigotry and all other nasty stereotypes. If we submit to their definition and become defensive, we have lost the debate and the war for Christian preservation, and, make no mistake about it, Talmudists/Zionists intend to destroy Christianity if they can.

While on the one hand SMYRNA criticizes Pat Robertson's errors about the "chosen ones", we defend him against those Jews who vilify him. The ADL recently published a report(4) in which Robertson and his Christian Coalition were maligned. This was reported in last month's SMYRNA. Jewish Alan Dershowitz, Harvard law prof and protagonist against Christian evangelizing (also on the defense team for O.J. Simpson), debated recently on Bill Buckley's "Firing Line" TV program. The subject was religious pluralism and the separation of church and state. Dershowitz opined that "Nazis in Idaho" and "Koreshes" should not be allowed to organize religious schools with their attendant privileges. During his closing remarks he derogatorily referred to Robertson and FaIwell as undesirables "out there". So much for the First Amendment and tolerance.

(4) "The Religious Right: The Assault on Tolerance & Pluralism in America". See also "Forward" newspaper, 6/10/94 p 4.

Return to Table of Contents


What The 700 Club "Fact Sheet" didn't tell us is that the reason for "anti-Semitism" in Russia is the absolute control over the USSR that Jewish leaders had since 1917. Their atrocities were many times worse than those of the Nazis. Now they are blaming the Russian people for hatred. SMYRNA doesn't condone hatred but we understand the reasons for it.

But did the Russians have a distaste for Jewish culture before 1917? Yes, for the same reasons as the early Christians. It isn't just that Talmudic leaders condemned Jesus and pressured Pontius Pilate into executing him, it is also that Talmudic-Cabalistic-Zionistic culture and Christian culture are radically different and even diametrically opposed. These are the basic reasons for so-called "anti-Semitism" in Russia today, but the 700 Club is giving out information designed by the Orwellian Newspeak masters.

As for "the second great exodus... from the north" thought to be a fulfillment of Isa. 43:5-6 and Jer. 16:14-16, one has to be captivated by the dogma of dispensationalism (brainchild of Talmudism) to believe this. Using these Scriptures out of context and without filtering them through the New Testament is an example of faulty hermeneutics. Those Scriptures were fulfilled long ago by ancient Israel. The only prophecies awaiting final development regarding today's so-called Israel (a creation of Talmudism-Zionism) are those connected with the brief success of world economic, political and religious control, after which will be judgment at the second advent of Jesus Christ.

Return to Table of Contents


Perhaps the most significant recent development of the "master plan" is revealed in the two-pronged attack on orthodox Christianity and Islam. Who would have thought just a decade ago that these two widely divergent religious groups would find themselves arrayed against a common "enemy" called Zionism? This phenomenon is not the creation of either of them, but rather the result of the plan by Zionists to make it so. Until now, Islam and Christianity have been enemies in the minds of many, but as the anti-Christ system reveals its identity ever more clearly, both orthodox Christianity and Islam are seen as its final targets for destruction. This is yet to be comprehended by most evangelical and fundamentalist Christians who have been neutralized by the tenets of Talmudic eschatology.

Christians are deeply concerned over the escalation of Christian bashing, including lawsuits of every kind. Thirty years ago this volume of bashing was unheard of, and even today the primary bashers are unsuspected by most Christians - at least they are unchallenged. Until now the bashers have been reticent to openly accuse the New Testament of being "anti-Semitic" for fear of waking up too many of its adherents, but their long term stratagems of infiltration and mass propaganda have been so successful that they can finally declare their intent. The best example of this declaration is their holocaust museum in Washington (paste photo***), with its attendant paraphernalia and disinformation. We now know for certain that they intend to demolish orthodox Christianity if possible. Orthodox Christians are those who haven't fallen for liberalism or Talmudic influences.

But how did Islam become the other target? That should be obvious in the political and economic realities of post-1948. Although some elements in the Arab world were probably created or managed by the world planners to serve their own ends, true believers in Islam oppose Zionism's propaganda and tactics. Because of this, little by little, Islamic activists have been pinpointed as enemies of the U.S. because America, as the power behind Zionism (or should we say the power OF Zionism) is the "Great Satan" to Islamites. This was made clear by the media after the bombing of the World Trade Center. The FBI, for example, is switching its emphasis from counter espionage to counter terrorism (See the "Forward" newspaper, Aug. 12,1994, p. 1, also "The Spotlight", Aug. 15,1994, p.5). It is convenient that this is made possible by the "demise" of the USSR and the end of the Cold War.(5) But suppose, just for brainstorming purposes, that the World Trade Center caper was pulled off by Israeli forces (perhaps in cahoots with others) for the purpose of angering Americans and solidifying their opposition to Islam. This tactic has always been used by nations at war, whether the wars were ideological or physical. But no matter who did it, Americans now hate the Islamic world more than ever.

(5) According to Devvy Kidd of Project '93, P.O. Box 492200, Redding, CA 96049-2200, Mikhail Gorbachev said in 1987: "Gentlemen, Comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep."

Another propaganda coup for the Zionists in their efforts to isolate and anathematize Islam and orthodox Christianity has recently been realized in the pact signed by forty prominent Evangelicals and Roman Catholics who agreed that Islam is the dangerous toe of Christianity (SMYRNA, June 1994). Thus the line has been drawn: Zionists and Judeophile Christians pitted against orthodox Christians and Muslims, both of whom, as a matter of propagandist's definition (also politically correct), are "anti-Semites", "bigots" and "racists" - "right-wing extremists".

Return to Table of Contents


But who are the real bigots? What group has an operative dogma built into its very existence which tells its followers that they are superior to all others? Following is that dogma. You be the judge.
"The Jewish people, Rabbi Judah Halevy (the famous medieval poet and philosopher) explains in his 'Kuzari', constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant... although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowned [sic] with a 'second soul' that renders them a separate species."(6)

(6) Zimmer, Uriel, "Torah-Judaism and the State of Israel", Congregation Kehillath Yaakov, Inc., NY. 5732 (1972), p. 12.

SMYRNA has quoted this many times, but we will continue to do so until it sinks in. Not all Jews believe this, but that makes little difference for [few] expose or renounce it.

Zimmer states:(7) "According to Jewish belief, the Jewish People constitutes a species of its own..." He comes to this conclusion by using Isa. 43:21 as a proof text, quoting: " 'This people I have created for Myself'". But Isaiah didn't write any such thing. In the King James Version it is translated: "This people have I formed for myself; they shall shew forth my praise." The word "formed" means molded, not created. In Gen. 1:1 for example, the English word "created" is taken from a different Hebrew word than the above word "formed". The Septuagmt makes it clearer by using the word "preserved". Therefore, those Jews who believe that they are a separate species are the world's worst big ots.

(7) Ibid

Return to Table of Contents


Getting back to the New World Order and its targeting the "right wing" in America (including orthodox Christians and Islam) for destruction, the new director of the FBI, Louis Freeh, has told Germany that the U.S. will clamp down on American publishers of neo-Nazi propaganda. The publication of Nazi symbols and slogans is prohibited in Germany, but not in the U.S., and - neo-Nazi material printed here can be legally exported to Germany. (See SMYRNA, 2/94 issue, pp. 10-11.) This is very important to the Jews, but it may end in the loss of free press to some in America.

In today's Germany where Jewish influence is enormous, the super secret police intelligence division known as BfV is blaming the American constitution for the rising tide of "anti-Semitism". Its director says that American freedom of speech and press make it possible for right-wingers to export "hate" literature to Germany. His government does not allow such liberty. Hate literature, of course, is anything critical of Jews or the Israeli govemment.

Thanks to the new FBI director, this cherished American freedom may be curtailed. He said, "We will look into the case to see if we can help the German authorities pursue any criminal acts under [German] laws or decide whether there has been any violation of U.S. laws."(8) If one-worlders attain their goals, Americans may be arrested and tried before an international tribunal; they will have no constitutional rights. Freeh continued: "there is a fairly fine line where an individual may go beyond mere speech or expressions and begin to aid or abet" a crime in Germany.(9) Who decides where that "fine line" will be drawn? In America it is the Justice Dept. where Jewish influence is very strong, possibly even controlling the Office of Special Investigations. (SMYRNA, 2/94)

(8) "Chicago Tribune", Dec. 19, 1993.

(9) Ibid.

According to the Jewish "Forward" newspaper, "The FBI's new director, Louis Freeh, has told a delegation of Jewish leaders that he is reassigning agents and seeking expanded financial resources to combat terrorism in the wake of the bombing sprees that rocked Buenos Aires, Panama and London. [An Argentine judge issued an international arrest warrant for four Iranian diplomats wanted in connection with the July 18 bombing, Reuters reported.]

"Mr. Freeh's remarks were made at a meeting with a delegation from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations led by its chairman, Lester Pollack.(10) In the closed-door briefing, the FBI director suggested there was a dramatic break with the priorities that shaped American law enforcement prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc."(11) On 8/23/94 this writer telephoned the FBI in Washington to confirm this information but its press office said that no press release was issued on this meeting. They could tell us nothing. Of course not! The Jewish leaders were given a secret special briefing and the Jewish media got the "dope" but the remainder of us got zilch.

(10) The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations is "...the nation's main Jewish umbrella group,..." ("Forward", 8/12/94, p.1)

(11) Aug. 12, 1994, pp. 1 & 3.

The orchestrated attack on all "right-wing" citizens in general and Islam in particular included a "documentary" by CNN aired in August, concentrating on international terrorists centered in Afghanistan. Peter Arnett was host and narrator. This TV presentation carried more influence than usual just because Arnett was chosen for the part. Remember, he's the reporter who stayed in Baghdad during "Desert Storm" and was accused by many of aiding our "enemy" Saddam Hussein. Naturally, if he has the image of being friendly toward the Moslems, he would be the ideal one to turn around and attack them. His credibility would be high. But whenever we see any given issue receiving an inordinate amount of attention in the media we immediately go on the alert for some major change or thrust in policies that affect us. And the new roles to be played by the FBI and the CIA are harbingers of refined planning by the one worlders.

What is the new function of the CIA? Well, maybe no function at all. In a special report by "U.S. News & World Report" (July 4,1994), the pattern as seen above was carried forward, i.e., that the FBI will be expanded and the CIA diminished or abolished. Entitled "The CIA's Darkest Secrets", the report painted a picture of incompetence and corruption within the super spy organization. Whether or not this is true (Deputy Director for Operations Ted Price says it isn't) the important thing to note is the overall scenario revealed by diverse interests such as Jewish groups, Christian Judeophiles, and government agents like the FBI's new director Louis Freeh. The Justice Dept. doesn't like "right-wingers" - somehow we get that feeling after the FBI murdered Americans at Ruby Ridge and Waco - and it is in a good position now to crack down on them regardless of innocence or guilt in any specific "crime". It winks at leftist para-military groups such as the Jewish Defense League (JDL). Even individual FBI agents and other law enforcement officers have been brainwashed against "right- wingers". Worse yet, many officers who are genuine Christians are at least partially blinded to the evil that pervades the system. Will they kill fellow Americans on orders from headquarters no matter how unconstitutional or immoral those orders might be? We will see!

Return to Table of Contents


Because we occasionally get inquiries about the name SMYRNA, we're taking this opportunity to explain why we decided to choose that name in 1977. There are four verses in the "Apocalypse of Jesus Christ" (commonly called the "Book of the Revelation") that furnish our raison d' e' tre. They will explain why the bulk of our reporting and commentary revolves around Jewish issues. In order to appreciate our posture, an explanation of those Bible verses is necessary. Please read them carefully.
"And to the messenger of the assembly in Smyrna write: These things says the first and the last, who became dead and lived. I know thy works and tribulation and poverty; but thou art rich; and the calumny of those who declare themselves to be Jews, and are not, but a synagogue of Satan. Fear not at all the things which thou art about to suffer. Lo, the devil is about to cast [some] of you into prison that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days. Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give to thee the crown of life. He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assemblies. He that overcomes in no wise shall be injured of the second death." (Rev. 2:8-11)

Smyrna was an ancient city in Asia Minor that still exists today on the west coast of Turkey, almost due east of Athens, Greece. It is now called Izmir. It was one of the seven churches to which the Apostle John wrote when the risen Christ commanded him to do so while John was on the island of Patmos about A.D. 95. As we can see, the Christians in Smyrna were being persecuted by the Jews, who were quite influential and powerful. As William Hendriksen noted: "Back of the Roman persecutors we see the Jews, filled with malign envy and hatred against believers and accusing them before the Roman tribunals."(12)

(12) "More Than Conquerors", Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, MI, 1939 & 1967, p. 81.

Jews who were Jews and not yet Jews

The first problem that confronts us in interpreting this passage is the apparent contradiction that there were Jews who claimed to be Jews but were not; they belonged to the synagogue of Satan. How could they be Jews and yet not Jews? The implication is that those who persecuted the Christians were not Jews - they only declared themselves to be. But if that were the case, why did they belong to the synagogue which was occupied by Jews? We know that Jesus had told the Jews some sixty-five or so years earlier that their father was the Devil (John 8:44). Why, then, would there be Jews who were not Jews? Part of the answer is in the translation as well as the interpretation.
Return to Table of Contents


The English word "Jew" is a transliteration of the prefix "Iou"; from the Greek word "Iodaios", which means "Judean". This prefix is pronounced "you". The alphabet of New Testament Greek does not contain the letter "J", and the English alphabet had no "J" prior to the 14th century, and it wasn't predominantly used until the 17th century. The King James Bible in 1611, for example, used the word "Iudea" for "Judea". The "J" evolved from the "I"

Some of the early English forms of the word Jews were: "Iues", "Ioues", "Iuus", "Iuwis", and "Iewes". We can see that the word "Jew" came only from the prefix of the Greek "Iodaios"("Iou"). Now that we know that the word "Jew" did not exist at the time of the writing of the New Testament (it's an English concoction), and that the word simply means "Judean", we need to know who the Judeans were.

Return to Table of Contents


Judeans were inhabitants of southern Canaan,(13) the area called Judea (Judaea) where Jerusalem and the temple were located. Judea is the same as Judah , and Judah was the tribe of Israel that was allocated that geographical area when all twelve tribes conquered the inhabitants of Canaan in about 1400 B.C. The patriarch of the tribe was the fourth son of Jacob, who was the son of Isaac, and Isaac was the son of Abraham. Jacob, who had been renamed Israel (Gen. 32:28) had twelve sons, each of whom was the patriarch of a tribe of Israel, each of which received a portion of the land of Canaan. God had already planned that the legal lineage of Messiah would be through Judah, for in Gen. 49:10 Moses wrote:
"The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be."

(13) Canaan later became known as Palestine.

Return to Table of Contents

Jesus Clashed with Judaism.

The Tribe of Judah was the largest of the twelve and the most influential. It had the place of leadership. God simply said that it would continue in this position until Shiloh, who was Messiah, came. Messiah would then take the leadership and receive the allegiance of the people. We now know that Jesus' legal lineage was traced through David back to Judah and to Abraham, and those who believed on Him gave Him their allegiance in fulfillment of the prophecy quoted above. He took the sceptre from Judah.

At the time of Christ's ministry, not all of the citizens of Judea were descended from Judah. Many were descendants of Esau who was Judah's uncle. However, they had submitted to circumcision about 130 B.C., consequently becoming co-religionists with the Judahites, who by then were practicing Rabbinism which had been developed during the exile in Babylon. Judeans (now called Jews), therefore, were those who practiced the religion with which Jesus clashed. Rabbinism was a conglomeration of Old Testament commands and rituals, Babylonian mysticism, and human rationalizations. It is referred to in the New Testament as the "tradition of the elders" (Matt. 15:1-3), and is known today as Talmudism, or Judaism. Its rulers were entrenched at Jerusalem in Judea.

To return to our original purpose, i.e., to learn why the Jews in Smyrna declared themselves to be Jews but were of the synagogue of Satan, we need to look at three other New Testament passages. first in the Gospel According to John, then in Romans, and finally in Galatians. The Apostle John recorded a confrontation between Jesus and the Jews (8:31-59) at which time Jesus told them that if they would follow Him they would know the truth and be set free, whereupon they retorted that they were descendants of Abraham and were not slaves to anyone. But Jesus said that those who commit sin are its slaves. He then acknowledged their genetic descendance from Abraham but denied that they were Abraham's children. He was, of course, distinguishing between physical and spiritual seed. This is a major point in Christian theology. The Jews stressed the importance of the material world and interpreted the Scriptures hyperliterally, whereas Jesus taught that spirituality is the condition that God desires. And because Abraham walked on a high plane of spiritual belief and behavior, his true descendants were those who followed in his footsteps and recognized the fulfillment of God's promises to him in the person of the Messiah Jesus.

Those who belong to Christ are the true seed of Abraham

As a corollary of the foregoing, all those who did not accept Jesus as Messiah were false Judahites (Jews) even though genetically descended from Judah. This same spiritual, biblical and historical error is made today. What's new and worse about it, however, is the defection of modern Fundamentalists and Evangelicals to the ancient error of the Jews who were not "Jews".

In Paul's Epistle to the Romans (2:28-29) we see the same tenet. Here is J.B. Phillips' paraphrase of the passage:

" I have come to the conclusion that a true Jew is not the man who is merely a Jew outwardly, and real circumcision is not just a matter of the body. The true Jew is one who belongs to God in heart, a man whose circumcision 's not just an outward physical affair but is a God-made sign upon the heart and sout and results in a lile lived not for the approval of man, but for the approval of God." (14)

(14) "Letters to Young Churches", The Macmillan Co., NY, 1951, p.7

Paul wrote again in the third chapter of Galatians that those who belong to Christ are the true seed of Abraham.

Now we are ready to come to a conclusion about the Jews (Judahites, Judeans) in Smyrna. Their circumcision meant nothing even though they were genetically descended from Abraham. They were of the synagogue of Satan because their hearts were not right with God. They had rejected God's son and relentlessly pursued and persecuted Christians. That's why the risen Christ (Messiah) whose voice sounded like many waters and whose countenance was as bright as the sun, commended His people at Smyrna for keeping the faith in spite of their suffering at the hands of the Jews.

Smyrna Publications was created as an adjunct of the Church of the New Testament in Sacramento, California. We aspired to follow in the footsteps of the early church in the ancient city of Smyrna. We still do. We attempt to tell the truth about those who say they are Jews but are not - those who are of the synagogue of Satan. This political incorrectness in today's mad world does not win much popularity but it is a rewarding task simply because it pursues truth when truth has become a casualty in the war for people's hearts and minds.

Return to Table of Contents


* Marcia Clarke, the L.A. County Deputy D.A. now prosecuting O.J. Simpson, is Jewish according to Steve Lipman's article in "The Jewish Week", Aug. 19,1994, who got it from "The Jerusalem Post Magazine". Lipman says that Allison Kaplan-Sommer who wrote the "Jerusalem Post" piece claims that Clarke "...was raised in a haredi, or rigidly Orthodox, family..." and that her first husband was Gabi Horowitz, an Israeli backgammon champion whom she divorced, apparently after he was shot in the head and confined to a wheel chair. In 1981 she married Gordon Clarke whom she is now suing for divorce. According to Lipman the Post said that "Clarke refused to comment on her Jewishness and Israeli connections."

Return to Table of Contents

* Religious News Service (RNS) reported in the 8/20/94 Long Beach Press Telegram that about 20 or 30 representatives from Jewish and evangelical Christian organizations will meet in Washington, DC late this year. The purpose of the meeting is "to shatter stereotypes". They need to meet and get to know one another better because "there is a common ground even on moral values between evangelicals and Jews which hasn't been discerned yet. There are principles and applications of principles that we can agree to, like the sanctity of life."(15)

(15) We might ask the question: "Whose lives are inviolable?" If non-Jews are a separate, inferior species, are their lives sacred? Could Eckstein's words be Newspeak?

These quotations come from Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, founder and president of International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, who is organizing the conference. SMYRNA reported on Rabbi Eckstein in its Aug. 1994 issue, noting that he developed the "evangelical desk" at the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and has been active in mission work aimed at evangelical Christians for many years. We pointed out that the ADL was created by B'nai B'rith, a most powerful exclusively Jewish, international Masonic organization. As an Orthodox rabbi, we call upon Eckstein to publicly renounce the extreme bigotry embodied in the quotation (above) from Uriel Zimmer's book, a dogma that emanates from the Talmud. And if he renounces this terrible belief, we further charge him not to use Kol Nidre as a mental reservation to avoid telling the truth. But, then, how would we ever know?

Return to Table of Contents

* The article at right [hard copy only - order from Smyrna]in the Sept. 2, 1994 issue of "Forward" tells us that the new crime bill has provisions in it against "hate crimes" This may sound innocuous but it also may be the most dangerous part of the entire bill. SMYRNA will let its readers conclude in what ways this could be.

Return to Table of Contents

* Haiti is in the news in a big way. Bill Clinton pleaded his case for invading Haiti on TV, telling Americans it is a national security matter as well as human rights issue that we risk the lives of our sons and daughters there. However, many do not see it that way. According to Criminal Politics (CP) magazine of April 1993 and July 1994 Jean Bertrand Aristide, the man Clinton and company wish to re-install, is an agent of world Zionism who speaks fluent Hebrew and is a Jewish rabbi (the Vatican defrocked him in 1988). CP gets this information from the horse's mouth, the Jewish press. CP believes that Aristide is the man chosen to reinstate the drug traffic from South America and China through Haiti to the U.S. America's embargo on that country only hurt the people and caused thousands to flee famine in boats bound for Florida. In other words, the world power clique caused the mess from the beginning.

Criminal Politics magazine referred to a New York Times article of 9/18/90 that stated: "Haitians Overwhelmingly Elect Leftist Priest as Their President". For the NYT to use the word leftist is solid evidence that Jean-Bertrand Aristide is at least a leftist and probably a Communist. He is without doubt a Zionist, and the world planners want him back in power. This is sufficient evidence for Americans to oppose the move. Former President George Bush says he opposes an invasion, but he was part of the problem in the first place. Gen. Norman Swartzkopf opposes the invasion also.

Even those who oppose the invasion of Haiti are forced to support the act once our military is committed, just as it happened in Desert Storm. This is a trap that plagues us every' time. For example, when Larry king interviews a guest who opposes military intervention he always asks: "But you will support the action once it starts, won't you?" What's the guest going to say? "No, I won't support our troops?" of course not! It's a trap. In other words, we could have Josef Stalin as President and he could commit our military to anything he wished and everyone would be forced to "support our men and women in the armed services". How do we get out of such a catch 22?

Aristide campaigned as a champion of the poor when he was elected in 1990. If the election wasn't rigged by the world planners, then the poor of Haiti grabbed onto the promises of better times. That's what the Communists have always banked on, and unless Americans wake up to the master conspiracy the Zionists/Communists will go right on winning. This writer, in conversation with an acquaintance recently, said: "If you believed my book "Strong Delusion", you would understand what's going on." He replied: "I just can't see a Jewish conspiracy." Well, that's the problem.

Return to Table of Contents


This is the headline ior an article by Jonathan Mahler in the "Forward" of 7/15/94. It complains of opinions being expressed on the huge computer network Internet that offend some Jews. A subheadline expresses the feelings of the "Forward": "A NETWORK OF CYBER-NAZIS GROWS ONLINE."

Are the shared ideas and opinions of individuals on the computer networks subsidized by the government? No. Are their opinions illegal? Not yet. Then what is the problem with those Jews who are "offended"? As Smyrna reported in July 1994, a Jewish woman was "offended" every time she walked into the cemetery in Tehachapi, California because there was a flower bed in the shape of a cross. The computer network case his is just one more where free speech is being challenged by those who believe in free speech only for themselves.

And as we reported in our April 1994 issue, many Jews protested the placement of ads in college student newspapers that challenged them to print opposing views on the "holocaust". The photo below shows a protest rally.[again pictures are in the written original]

On the other hand, it's OK for the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC - with public funds - to bash the New Testament and its adherents. The blatant hypocrisy of Jewish leaders should be obvious to everyone by now, everyone, that is, except the hypocrites themselves and the Judeo-philes. However, it isn't really hypocrisy or a double standard if non-Jews comprise an inferior species.

The five.story, $150 million US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. was built and is operated by a taxpayer.funded federal agency.

ARISTIDE: The defrocked leftist-"priest" who is really a Jewish rabbi & Zionist. This is what Clinton & bosses are doing in [to] Haiti!

Return to Top
o Back to Apostasy
o Go to October 1994

Courtesy and care of: Be Wise As Serpents BBS
International Christian Educational Services