SMYRNA - November 1994





o Updating Reminiscences
o In Trouble At Good Ol' Cal
o Updating the Scenario
o More on Zhirinovsky
o Nothing New - The Infamous "Jesus Seminar"
o Victories & Defeats
o The Fed's Mafia
o They Did It Again!

Updating Reminiscences

The prejudices that lead to inconsistencies in the operational tactics of liberals, leftists, socialists and communists are astounding. Regardless of their extremes, they justify their behavior with whatever casuistic inventions are convenient. Let's take the case of the notorious operations of the leftists on the campus of the University of California at Berkeley. After excerpting an article of mine that appeared in my weekly column of the Contra Costa Times back in 1969, I will update it with recent events. Here it is:

". . . In Trouble At Good Ol, Cal"

"For a minute I thought I was in Red China. The young Communist who stood before me was arrogant, belligerent and demanding - perhaps he would have shot me. His mannerisms projected the impression that he expected me to wither under his gaze and slink away like a cowed dog. It occurred to me, however, that I did not need to respond the way he wanted me to. I remembered - with difficulty I confess that I was still in the good 'ol U.S.A. and I didn't have to take orders from a Commie punk.(1)

(1) Some Christians may think I was too harsh. Perhaps I was.

"It isn't easy to feel one's birthright as a free citizen of this country in the Communist capital of North America - in Berkeley. Ah, yes. In Berkeley where there is only one absolute, the absolute certainty that Communist agitators will get all the protection and comfort they require. All other facets of social interaction are subject to the intense scrutiny and interpretation of the intellectual egotists. For instance, truth is non-existent. It is purely relative, and most of the time it is irrelevant.

In my opinion, the distortion of truths has become a way of life for the sophisticated, liberal universityites. These particular people have made such a practice of questioning anything and everything for so many years that they could not recognize truth if it tickled them under their noses. Socrates wouldn't have had a ghost of a chance with these cerebro-cortico-maniacs. But back to my encounter with 'Mao Tse tung, Jr.'

"I had displeased him acutely... [because I had enforced the rules regarding bulletin board postings]. "One would have thought by the reaction of the hard-core activists that I had single-handedly repealed the Constitution.

"They cried 'censorship' to the high heavens. They bemoaned their loss of free speech. They accused me of sending their revolutionary material to the C.I.A. and of returning to the McCarthy era.

"If there is one thing that you may depend upon to be consistent in the methodology of the Marxist agitators it is this: They will cloud the real issues of a dispute and distort their opposition's statements and motives. In short, they are very adept at smearing individuals and organizations which oppose them. Talk about the so-called character assassinations of Joe McCarthy; well, he couldn't hold a candle to these propagandists. They could make Hansel and Gretel out to be wicked witch hunters! Come to think of it, I haven't read that folktale for some time; perhaps I should check it to see if there have been some changes. You know, Hansel and Gretel could be expansionist imperialists who invaded the modest territory of this sweet little old lady, burned her with napalm and ate up her property...

"Student revolutionists care not whom they destroy. They are sweet as honey until you cross them. Then they are ruthless as a steamroller. They make the loudest cries about their Constitutional rights while all the while plotting how to deprive others of the same. They bask in the 'sun' of this country's freedoms, using them as their shields and armor to wage war against us."

Return to Table of Contents


Now return in time to the present and the scenario that unfolded in Berkeley on Oct. 13, 1994 when British historian David Irving spoke at the YWCA. The Trotskyites, Spartacus Youth Club and Socialists invaded the meeting, assaulted Irving and several of the audience, and destroyed hundreds of dollars' worth of his literature. What provoked those hoodlums? Irving was telling the truth about the "Holocaust" and they didn't want his version of history revealed.

But think for a moment: Why would the Trotskyites, the Spartacus Youth Club, and the Socialists give a rap about the "Holocaust? Why shouid the communists attack an "anti-Semite"? Haven't we been told for years that the Jews in the Soviet Union were persecuted by the communists? Why would communists who hate Jews defend them so vigorously in America?

Folks, don't believe everything you see on TV and in the managed press. The truth is that communism/socialism are products of Jewish minds, and the fracas at Berkeley is excellent evidence to that effect. How do I know that the violence of the Trotskyites, Spartacus Youth Club and Socialists was communist instigated? On the Opinion page of the Daily Californian of Oct. 25, 1994 one Skye White [real name?] stated: "We communists of the Spartacus Youth Club do not look to the government, administration or the cops to 'ban the fascists.'" This, of course, is an admission that they take the "law" into their own hands and bash skulls. This writer believes that if you scratch a communist leader you will often uncover a Jew. This is why David Irving is so hated by them.

Incidentally, true to form as indicated in my article back in 1969, Mr. Skye White fabricated part of the recent Berkeley episode by claiming that there were "swastika-waving Nazis" at Irving's meeting. Eyewitnesses categorically deny this. Further, the Daily Cal says that White is an alumnus of U.C. Berkeley, who refers to the 1960's "Free Speech" movement as if he were there at the time. This would make the two of us contemporaries and since he characterizes the agitators of that era as the good guys and gals, he is once more spinning leftist propaganda. I know I was there.

It. is interesting to note that Skye White's Opinion Page harangue divulges information about organizations in Europe, Canada and the U.S. that only a close follower or member of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith would ordinarily know. This, of course, is a dead giveaway of his real identity and motives. Scratch a communist leader and find a Jew? The chances are better than average!

Return to Table of Contents

More on Zhirinovsky

According to the L.A. Times of Nov. 2, 1994, Vladimir Zhirinovsky(2) was granted a visa to visit the U.S. for 14 days, beginning Nov. 4. Although certain organizations wanted him barred, the government could find no legal reason to do so, and officials calculated that if he were denied a visa it would strengthen his political image in Russia; he would be perceived as a martyr, so the visa was granted.

(2) See SMYRNA. July 1994

The Times article contained the usual propaganda. "Over the last few years, Zhirinovsky has aired some openly racist and extremist views of the United States. He has written that some time in the next century, America's white population will perish, swamped by blacks and Latinos, and that the United States will go the way of the Soviet Union..."

Whether or not he actually said this SMYRNA does not know. But the Times writer, Jim Mann, referred to him as an ultranationalist", "extremist", "racist", and the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, which urged Secretary of State Warren Christopher to refuse Zhirinovsky a visa, noted that in July Zhirinovsky had met with "Canada's leading neo-Nazi, Ernst Zundel." The National Conference on Soviet Jewry also opposed Zhirinovsky's visit.

If we carefully note the sources of the opposition brought against Vladimir Zhirinovsky, both in Russia and the U.S., we will begin to discern whether or not he is the villain he is cast as, or perhaps he is telling a great deal of truth. SMYRNA advises others not to be hasty in calling Zhirinovsky another Hitler. There are no saints in this political war, and he may not be our cup of tea, but his enemies are apparently our enemies. Or perhaps he is a plant by our enemies.

Those who do not understand the anti-Christ conspiracy will never discern who their real enemies are.(3) What a pity!

(3) Few people truly comprehend.

Return to Table of Contents

Nothing New

In a story by Susanne Boynton published by the Santa Rosa Press-Democrat of Oct. 14, 1994, 25 of 26 members of the infamous Jesus Seminar(4) group voted their conclusion that Jesus was not born of a virgin. One of these, Prof Jane Schaberg of the University of Detroit Mercy, a Jesuit school, had made a presentation to this effect after which the vote was taken. She said that the notion of a virgin birth represented another example of subjugation of women, and that Christ was in fact an illegitimate child.

(4) See also SMYRNA of Nov. '93 & May '94.

Some newspapers did not mention her name; they only referred to her as a "feminist theologian."(5) What kind of theologian is a "feminist theologian"? We presume that it is one who purports to study God with the preconceived notion that God gave women a raw deal. Actually, the feminist movement per se is one of the many tentacles of the conspiracy octopus.

(5) Daily Breeze via The Christian News, 10/31/94 p. 11

But the revealing clue that identifies the Jesus Seminar as an instrument in the hands of Talmudic propagandists is the claim that Jesus was an illegitimate child. That dastardly lie comes from the Jewish Talmud, and either Prof Jane Schaberg is Jewish or she is serving Jewish leaders slavishly. So she isn't a free woman after all. Here is the documentation for the lie:

"Once when the elders were seated at the Gate, two young men passed by, one of whom had his head covered, the other with his head bare. Rabbi Eliezer remarked that the one in his bare head was illegitimate, a mamzer. Rabbi Jehoschua said that he was conceived during menstruation, ben niddah. Rabbi Akibah, however, said that he was both. Whereupon the others asked Rabbi Akibah why he dared to contradict his colleagues. He answered that he could prove what he said. He went therefore to the boy's mother whom he saw sitting in the market place selling vegetables and said to her: 'My daughter, if you will answer truthfully what I am going to ask you, I promise that you will be saved in the next life.' She demanded that he would swear to keep his promise, and Rabbi Akibah did so - but with his lips only, for in his heart he invalidated his oath. Then he said: 'Tell me, what kind of son is this of yours'? To which she replied: 'The day I was married I was having menstruation, and because of this my husband left me. But an evil spirit came and slept with me and from this intercourse my son was born to me.' Thus it was proved that this young man was not only illegitimate but also conceived during the menstruation of his mother. And when his questioners heard this they declared: 'Great indeed was Rabbi Akibah when he corrected his Elders'! And they exclaimed: 'Blessed be the Lord God of Israel who revealed his secret to Rabbi Akibah the son of Joseph.'" (Tract Kallah, 1b (18b)

The above is quoted from The Talmud Unmasked by I.B. Pranaitis, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1892. Pranaitis quoted at length from the renowned Johannes Buxtorf (1564-1629), Hebrew and Rabbinic scholar who had demonstrated that the above passage as well as others from the Talmud referred to Jesus and His mother Mary, even though the time frame of the passage above might be out of sequence. Buxtorf, according to Pranaitis, wrote: "'Other circumstances may seem to contradict this. But that is nothing new in Jewish writings and is done on purpose so that Christians may not easily detect their trickery.'"

It is clear that the Jesus Seminar in Sonoma, California is guided by the ancient Jewish defamation of Jesus Christ. The public, of course, being oblivious to the conspiracy, will gobble up the disinformation dispersed by the mass media which report the "findings" of these "scholars". Truly, there's nothing new under the sun. The most dangerous and effective foe of true Christianity today is Talmudism and fellow travellers, the very same foes that condemned Jesus and caused His crucifixion nearly two thousand years ago.

Return to Table of Contents

Victories & Defeats

Conservatives are ecstatic about the Republican victories over the Democrats recently. We, too, are happy because the mood of the voters was commendable. The apparent meaning of the voter choices is that the majority are unhappy with the very liberal policies of the Democrats. The obvious immoral and possibly criminal ties that Bill and Hillary Clinton have in Arkansas, and the way the Democrats in Congress were covering them up, probably affected the election also. This is good news.

There is some bad news, too. Teddy "Bare" Kennedy, coming from behind, retained his seat in the Senate. We wonder how that happened. Is his political machine in Massachusetts so old and so powerful that it can't be beat? Was the ballot counting rigged? Or are the people of Massachusetts so immoral or stupid that they produce such results repeatedly?

The absentee ballots in California are not yet counted so we do not know officially whether Diane Feinstein or Michael Huffington won. A Republican official has reportedly legally halted the process for an as yet unknown reason.

One of the worst bits of news for moral people is what Arne Carlson, Democratic candidate for governor in Minnesota, maliciously did to his opponent, Allen Quist, who is a Christian. Quist took a stand against abortion and homosexuality, so the spin doctors of Carlson's campaign created a media image of him and his supporters as Nazis. Apparently, the voters couldn't see beyond the scam and Carlson won. In an interview with a Jewish magazine, Carl son called Quist "'a cult leader with a Messianic complex.'"

So you see, dear readers, how far advanced the Talmudic/Zionist war against Christianity is.(6)

(6) Human Events via American Information Newsletter, Oct. 1994.

Return to Table of Contents

The Fed's Mafia:

Under the heading of IRS Violates Bankruptcy Protection, The Bill Benson newsletter(7) tells of the case of J.L. Hudson who filed for bankruptcy in March 1993 and listed the IRS as a creditor. The cause of his bankruptcy was partly due to an IRS levy against his wages.

(7) Sign of the times, Nov. 1994

The IRS did not file a proof of claim and Hudson filed an unsecured priority proof of claim on behalf of the IRS for full payment. The court confirmed the bankruptcy in August then notified the IRS, which took no action.

In April 1993 Hudson and wife filed their 1992 tax returns, showing a refund of $1,245, but the IRS intercepted it and applied it to their previous tax liability. Hudson sued the IRS for violating the automatic stay which is binding on all creditors. However, the IRS claimed sovereign immunity and said the bankruptcy court had no jurisdiction over it.

If the IRS had requested relief from the automatic stay it could have legally applied the refund to the liability, but it didn't. It wrongfully withheld the refund while the bankruptcy case was pending.

The court ruled in Hudson's favor, awarding him the full tax refund plus $300 legal costs.(8)

(8) U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Georgia, Augusta Div., Adv. No. 93-1059,1/31/94.

SMYRNA reports this case because it is illustrative of government tyranny. Any time that any government can confiscate our property (and money is property) without due process of law, that's a dictatorship. And it is especially galling that the power of the IRS is exerted on behalf of the Fed, a private corporation that controls our money system unconstitutionally, making trillions of dollars in the process.

Return to Table of Contents

They Did It Again!

Congress did it again! Those who read SMYRNA know that we broke the story nationwide about the promotion of the Noahide laws by Congress and the President back in 1991. Congress at the same time honored Rebbe Menachem Schneerson, patriarch of an ultra-orthodox Jewish group.

According to a story in The Jewish Week (10/13/94) an "honor bestowed on fewer than 100 individuals in the course of the nation's history" was posthumously awarded Rabbi Schneerson by unanimous consent of Congress and the President. It is the Congressional Gold Medal. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Alfonse D'Amato (R-NY), Charles Schumer (D-NY), John Lewis (D-GA), Newt Gingrich (R-GA), and Jerry Lewis (R-CA).

The medal was first awarded to George Washington and most recently to Colin Powell and Norman Schwarzkopt.

Return to Top
o Back to Apostasy
o Go to December 1994

Courtesy and care of: Be Wise As Serpents BBS
International Christian Educational Services