SMYRNA - May 1995

SMYRNA

E-MAIL: JereM541@aol.com

MAY 1995



TABLE OF CONTENTS:

o The Incendiary Connection
o Cult Awareness Network
o Latest on the ADL
o "A Lie Can Travel Around the World . . ."
o Will the Real Paul Warburg Please Stand Up?!
o Yahweh . . .
o Even SMYRNAIs Completely Surprised . . .
o Some Children Seem to be More Important . . .
o News You May Have Missed
o Jesse Jackson - Race Hatered
o Here's How It Works, Folks!
o Guess What?! / SPLC
o New Perspective?
o Government Terrorist Activity
o Talmud Tales of a Roman Holocaust


THE INCENDIARY CONNECTION

[As a Christian-based publication, Smyrna's primary reason for existence has always been to bring the truth of important issues to its readers as fully as its capabilities and resources would allow. We believe that our Creator has commanded all people everywhere to practice justice, and in former articles we have stated that the Bible equates justice with righteousness. Too many have been spooked by the word "righteousness" because it sounds so religious and unattainable. However, when we realize that it is the same as justice, it immediately takes on a more understandable connotation.

To be just in all our dealings simply requires that we be honest, faithful, merciful, and consistent with others. Our God possesses such a character, and in the Bible it is often translated "righteousness".

The following article deals with this issue. Hopefully, it will point up the astounding lack of justice as a motivating factor in the minds of O.J. Simpson's lawyers. We urge our readers to carefully consider it because it isn't about O.J. Simpson's case per se, but about justice.]


We all recall the famous lawyer F. Lee Bailey's cross examination of Detective Mark Fuhrman and Bailey's accusation that Fuhrman had planted the bloody glove on Simpson's property. What most people don't know is why Simpson's defense team chose to accuse Fuhrman of such a dastardly deed (a capital offense). Where did they get such a notion? What kind of evidence did they have to back up their charge?

It all started soon after Robert Shapiro took Simpson's case. A plan of defense was necessary, and a major decision was made regarding that plan. According to Jeffrey Toobin's article An Incendiary Defense in The New Yorker magazine of July 25, 1994, "...leading members of Simpson's defense team floated this new and provocative theory as part of both the public-relations war surrounding the case and their continuing effort to keep the prosecution off balance. Those conversations revealed that they plan to portray the detective as a rogue cop who, rather than solving the crime, framed an innocent man." That "theory" as they and the media so flippantly and consistently call it, violates every element in a true concept of justice.

To get right at the heart of the mind-set of Alan Dershowitz and Robert Shapiro - to demonstrate exactly how immoral (unjust) they really are - let us look at the ending of Toobin's article in The New Yorker: The race card, says Toobin, "...may be the only one in Simpson's hand. But it appears that his defense team will be playing it, even if it means that helping 0.J. Simpson threatens the tender peace of the city of Los Angeles. To Alan Dershowitz, one of Simpson's legal strategists, such a tradeoff may well be worth making." This statement is incredible! It offends the moral sensibilities of all decent people. Alan Dershowitz is willing to embroil Los Angeles in riots again in order to get his client off. It doesn't matter if Simpson brutally murdered Nicole and Goldman; winning the case is all-important. Note what Dershowitz stated in his book, The Best Defense, according to Toobin:

" 'Once I decide to take a case, I have only one agenda: I want to win. I will try, by every fair and legal means, to get my client off - without regard to the consequences' "

This statement by a militant Jewish activist who was once a Nazi youth is not surprising, even though it is repugnant. But it is also contradictory. Instead of including the word "fair", he should have included only the word "legal", because it is impossible to be fair and careless of consequences simultaneously. And it is obvious now that Dershowitz, Shapiro, Cochran and Bailey are devoid of the quality of being fair. Having accused Mark Fuhrman of the capital crime of planting evidence against Simpson (they are now including several Los Angeles police officers and forensics employees of a conspiracy), and being willing to catapult the city into riots where human life and property are endangered, they have shown their abandon to immorality, and, we believe their acts should also be unlawful.

Many fair-minded citizens across the country believe that the "Dream Team" (which should be changed to the "Mean Team") is simply trying to confuse the jury so that either a hung jury or a mistrial will be the outcome. This tactic is itself immoral (unjust, unrighteous) and is an integral part of their callous natures.

It is interesting to note that, in comparison, several lawyers in Oklahoma have refused to represent Timothy McVeigh, accused of being one of the bombers of the federal building in Oklahoma City April 19, 1995, because their personal feelings will not let them practice the "sacred" tenet of "everyone is entitled to a fair trial." It seems that some crimes are more revolting than others, and also that some people, being rich and famous, wield more clout with the "ideologues". If Simpson murdered Nicole and Goldman (having nearly severed their heads and stabbed Goldman 30 or 40 times), isn't that sufficiently brutal to make some lawyers not want to represent him? What hypocrites we mortals be! "Justice" - a noble word for noble characters - must be very lonely in this world, especially in the hearts of Alan Dershowitz, Robert Shapiro, Johnnie Cochran, F. Lee Bailey, Jeffrey Toobin and the publishers of The New Yorker.

Turning our attention now to the mechanics of playing the race card in the Simpson case, it is important that we mark the involvement of The New Yorker and Jeffrey Toobin, for they were the first to plant the seeds of suspicion against Detective Mark Fuhrman in the minds of the public. Just seven days after their article appeared, Jet magazine, a periodical for the black community, picked up Toobin's story and passed it on. This is how it's done in propaganda circles. Once the seeds are planted they grow and spread like wildfire. There is little wonder that Jeanette Harris, the black juror dismissed recently, was so favorable to O.J. Simpson, because the propaganda mill had added more fuel to her already smouldering racism. So The New Yorker and Jet are culpable in this scenario of unrighteousness (injustice).

Now let us take this unsavory conspiracy a bit further. Let us "theorize" about a possible connection between Dershowitz, Shapiro and a secretive organization well known to us as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith. We have written many times about this Jewish organization that wields great influence. It is so influential that many people believe that it virtually controls the Special Investigations unit of the Justice Department. It also undoubtedly furnishes intelligence information to the FBI, the ATF and other government agencies, for it is not restricted by law in the gathering of intelligence data. In fact, it has purloined information from police files in San Francisco. It is also close to the Cult Awareness Network (CAN - see below). It has its "spies" everywhere, and we believe that Alan Dershowitz is either directly or indirectly linked to it. And since Robert Shapiro is Jewish, he, too, may benefit from ADL's intelligence. If Dershowitz and Shapiro obtained information from Detective Mark Fuhrman's personnel files, it could have been ADL agents who did it.

Is Jeffrey Toobin, staff writer for The New Yorker, also Jewish? Would he cooperate in a plot to fan the flames of racism and accuse Fuhrman of a capital crime? This writer talked to him by telephone on April 26th and asked him these questions: "Which Simpson lawyers did you speak to?" He said, "No comment." I asked, "Which lawyer described Fuhrman as a 'bad cop' "? "No comment." "Did you talk to Dr. Ronald Koegler and Dr. John Hochman?"(1) He didn't know who they were at first, but then said that their reports were included in the lawsuit filed by Fuhrman against L.A. "Did you go to L. A. for your research?" "No comment." "Was Fuhrman ever sued for a civil rights violation?" "Yes, but unsuccessfully." "Are you Jewish?" At this he nearly exploded. "Why would you ever ask a question like that?" I said I wanted background information on him. He said, "Absolutely no comment!"

(1) Two psychiatrists or psychologists who allegedly evaluated Fuhrman during his suit against the city.

To recapitulate, we see a chain of events in the O.J. Simpson case that implicate Alan Dershowitz, Robert Shapiro, Jeffrey Toobin and The New Yorker in a conspiracy to "play the race card" and accuse Detective Mark Fuhrman of a capital crime. Playing the race card also ran the risk of race riots in Los Angeles, a risk they were willing to take. This behavior, in Smyrna's opinion, is grossly immoral and should be unlawful.

As for our "theory" that these Jewish lawyers and the Jewish influenced magazine The New Yorker had help from the Anti-Defamation League in framing Mark Fuhrman, it makes more sense than the Dream Team's postulate that several police officers and the forensics department of Los Angeles conspired to frame Simpson. What's sauce for the goose...


Return to Table of Contents

Cult Awareness Network

As examples of C.A.N.'s work, consider the Waco and Ruby Ridge massacres. Recall that the government hitman (we dislike using this term, but that's exactly what he was) Lon Horiuchi testified under oath that Vicki Weaver was profiled as the most radical in the group. He had never met the woman, yet he wanted to kill her because his superiors told him she was the most radical. How did his superiors know?

Enter the Cult Awareness Network, a "clearing house and information central about cult activities", according to an AP release. C.A.N. is run by Cynthia Kisser from a suburban Chicago office. According to Marty Butz in their office, C.A.N. has 20 branch offices across the country. Four organizations that he mentioned as board members or participants were: the Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services; the Commission on Cults & Missionaries, a part of which are the Jewish Federation Council of Greater Los Angeles and the Greater Miami Jewish Federation.

It is easy to see that C.A.N., a 501(c)3 organization, is really a Jewish front. This explains why B'nai B'rith and its ADL are so bound up with its operation. In fact, some believe that C.A.N. was begun and is controlled by the ADL, but that matters little. The fact that it is a Jewish front is enough to know that when it targets a "cult", it is because the destruction of the target group would serve the purposes of the Talmudic-Kabbalistic-Israeli complex, and ultimately the New World Order.


Return to Table of Contents

THE LATEST ON THE ADL

Conservatives are not "just whistling Dixie" when they say that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is a secret intelligence organization with "spies" everywhere. The 4/28/95 issue of the Jewish newspaper Forward corroborates this. As a reaction to the Oklahoma City bombing, the Forward lamented the bad treatment of the ADL when it reportedly illegally obtained intelligence files from the San Francisco Police Dept. The Forward stated: "The rise of violent right-wing elements like the ones thought responsible for the Oklahoma bombing might have been contained if the Anti-Defamation League, along with national and local law enforcement agencies, had not been hampered in the past two years from pursuing their investigative work."

FIRST, this is an admission that the ADL spies on anyone or any group that it thinks needs to be tracked. SECOND, it implies that the ADL is in league with law enforcement agencies, either directly or indirectly (see our article later on in this newsletter). It would surprise us if the ADL had not been tracking Mark Fuhrman. THIRD, if one wishes to really stretch the mind, one could see long term benefits accruing to the ADL and its associates from the Oklahoma tragedy. It is now obvious that a "right-wing" movement in America corresponds to the "right-wing" in Russia, and the most prominent common denominator is that "anti-Semitism" is attributed to both. Remember, "anti-Semitism" is necessary for Talmudists-Cabbalists-Zionists to succeed. Class struggle, which results from the Marxist strategy of thesis, antithesis and synthesis, is their game plan, and it has been working well for many years.


Return to Table of Contents

"A Lie Can Travel Around the World
Before the Truth Can Get Its Shoes On"

--Mark Twain

By James Floyd

Frank Rich, in an article in the New York Times (3/9/95 p.A15) entitled, The Jew World Order, teamed up with Ron Chernow to attack with alacrity the followers of the hated Nazarene, more commonly known as Christians. Conversely, Frankie would have us join him in lauding all Jews and all things Jewish. Mr. Rich and others are this nation's leading historical revisionists and are determined to disallow any attempt at involving the Warburgs, Rothschilds, Schiffs, and others in the enormously successful conspiracy known as the Federal Reserve. Rich did a masterful job in this piece of linking Louis Farrakhan and Pat Robertson. How cruel and demeaning. Mr. Rich should apologize to Minister Farrakhan immediately.

The flap is about what the protestors of Jewish sensitivities call "thinly veiled anti-Semitism". Obviously, Rich and other champions of the Encyclopedia Judaica's version of history vehemently resent even the mildest exposure of the international bankers and their goyim cohorts. Pat Robertson's nonsensical scribblings which he called The New World Order was in the main inert and unrevealing, yet to zealots like Rich, Rev. Pat committed the unpardonable sin. Puckering Pat lost no time in expressing shock that anyone could possibly think that his description of international bankers referred to Jews. Well, Mr. Robertson, who the heck did you think they were - Hawaiians? Did you think their money came from pineapple juice?

So, Frank Rich and Ron Chernow forced Preacher Pat to bow down and grovel. All because Pat called a pack of thieving conspirators "international bankers", and because Mr. Rich and Mr. Chernow believed they could lie with impunity. So they lied big time.

WILL THE REAL PAUL WARBURG PLEASE STAND UP?

The New York Times article has Ron Chernow telling us that Paul Warburg was "depressed", "morbidly shy", and "to single out Paul Warburg as the kingpin of a conspiracy is absurd." But this writer read Ronnie's boring book. On page 133 he uses the term "Paul and his coconspirators", and in the last paragraph of the same page Warburg is called 'forceful" and "tenacious" Warburg "dubbed himself a fanatic about the banking scheme" And in the center of page 134 Ronnie Chernow singles out Paul Warburg as "playing an aggressive role, for a foreign Jew... especially in matters of money - was daring and courageous."

So we see Chernow painting Paul Warburg as two different characters: as MORBIDLY SHY, DEPRESSED, INCAPABLE OF CONSPIRACY, NO KING-PIN, and also as A CO CONSPIRATOR, FORCEFUL, TENACIOUS, FANATICAL, AGGRESSIVE and DARING.

Let us put some foot-wear on the truth. Were it not for the vulgar dominance of our media by this "chosen" group, this writer would buy the truth a shoe store, and the American people would be the beneficiaries.

(Mr. Floyd is a radio talk-show-host-turned-writer. He no longer works for radio station WAJF (1490 & 860 AM) in Decatur. Alabama because Morley Denbro, wealthy owner of Denbro Iron & Metal co. in Decatur is a Jewish activist who threatened to blow up the station and squash Mr. Floyd like a bug. A complaint by Floyd and the station owner to the FBI and U.S. Attorney has thus far produced no fruit.

Smyrna doesn't necessarily endorse all that Mr. Floyd writes and speaks. but we believe his views are entitled to a wide audience. He is solely responsible for the accuracy of his information.)


Return to Table of Contents

YAHWEH

We cannot break God's laws - but we can break ourselves against them. --A. Maude Royden

I used to ask God to help me. Then I asked if I might help him. I ended up by asking him to do his work through me. --Hudson Taylor

There is an enmity between what is of God and what is of man. --Tertullian


Return to Table of Contents

EVEN SMYRNA IS COMPLETELY SURPRISED SOMETIMES

Ralph de Toledano is a nationally syndicated colunmist and a contributing editor to National Review, which is William Buckley's creation. This, of course, is not a secret, nor is it a secret that de Toledano was a prominent and prolffic contributor to the John Birch Society's publications (perhaps he still is). What surprised us recently was the discovery of an article by him in Midstream magazine, a Jewish publication. At first we attributed it to the probability that Midstream occasionally allows non-Jewish writers inside its covers of Jewish intellectualism. Then came the real surprise! Ralph de Toledano is Jewish, and what's more, he's a Sephardic Jew. How did we learn this? The Jan. 1995 issue of Midstream published a letter to the editor from de Toledano who revealed his ancestry.

But even that is not all. He commended George Jochnowitz who, he said, "...demolishes the theory that Eastern and Central European Jews are not Semites..." Jochnowitz had written a review essay of Paul Wexler's The Ashkenazic Jews: A Slavo-Turkic People in the Oct. 1994 issue of Midstream. So - it is obvious that there is controversy in the Jewish community over the origin of Ashkenazim Jews. Smyrna has referenced three sources in the past for information on the non-Semitic background of Eastern European Jews: D.M. Dunlop's The History of the Jewish Khazars, Arthur Koestler's The Thirteenth Tribe, and Alfred Lilienthal's What Price Israel and The Zionist Connection II Koestler and Lilienthal were Jews, and Dunlop was Professor of Middle Eastern History at Columbia University. While it would be difficult for us to discount the opinions of the above trio since their evidence is very strong, we also acknowledge the capabilities of Ralph de Toledano. Let us, therefore, approach the problem from another perspective, one that essentially concludes that it doesn't make any real difference.

If Ashkenazim Jews originated from Turko-Slavic peoples, they would not be of Semitic stock, therefore "anti-Semitism" would be a practically meaningless term because 90% (or more) of the world's Jews are Ashkenazim. However, let's assume for the moment that they are descended from Shem (son of Noah), and let's even grant that they are genealogically pure, which is impossible. Allowed all these arguments beneficial to their cause, there remain fundamental problems with Jewry and its claim to ancient promises made by God to Israel.

Not all Jews believe that the political-religious state of Israel' is legitimate, but they are in a small minority. Furthermore, Smyrna is not concerned about Jews who support or do not support "Israel". We are interested in the reasons why so many Christians support her, and we limit our discussion to evangelicals and fundamentalists whose support is based on erroneous interpretations of prophecy.

There are so many Biblical evidences to demonstrate that Israel was terminated as a religious and political entity in A.D. 70 that much space would be needed to elaborate on them. But let us mention only one that should be sufficient to prove our case. When Jesus was crucified the thick curtain that separated the Holy of Holies room from the larger room Holy Place (see diagram) [in original "hard copy" --BeWISE] was torn from top to bottom. This curtain, or veil, was 60 ft. high, 30 ft. wide, and extremely thick. It was so heavy that (Edersheim says that in the exaggerated language of the time) 300 priests were required to manipulate it. In other words, a supernatural force was required to rend it. There were other supernatural events that occurred at the crucifixion, but we shall limit our discussion to the tearing of the veil.

Why did such an enormous curtain separate the Holy of Holies from the rest of the temple? This was where God's shekinah (His manifest presence) stayed. The high priest entered this sanctuary once a year as confessor of his and the people's sins. He sprinkled the blood of a sacrificed animal on the mercy seat. No one else was allowed in that Holy of Holies. This was the method dictated by God to Moses whereby the people could obtain forgiveness for their sins. The high priest was an imperfect, temporary mediator between the people and God Almighty. Therefore, entering the Holy of Holies meant entering into the very presence of God Himself. This fact made it impossible for Israelites to practice their faith and rituals (their religion) without the temple. This is why, when they were taken into captivity to Assyria and later Babylonia, they developed a new religion-Judaism. The synagogue came into being.

The fundamental question now arises: What was the significance of the veil being torn when Jesus was crucified? It meant that God's presence was no longer in the Holy of Holies room, no longer in the temple - He was no longer available there to grant mercy and forgiveness to the people. That was an awful, frightening prospect! No way to receive forgiveness for sin? Eternally damned forever? We shudder at the very thought! God was no longer present with Israel. How, then, would anyone approach the Almighty? It would not be in the temple. Furthermore, some forty years later it was totally destroyed, anyway. Israel, as a nation formed by God, having been created with the tabernacle and later the temple as the center of its very existence, was gone. Vanished.

[And yet BeWISE wonders how we can explain away the fact that Yahweh Himself promised that Israel shall be His forever: Gen 17:7, I Sam 12:22, II Sam 7:24, Isaiah 45:17, etc...and this has been confirmed well into the New Testement: Rom 11:1-2, Heb 8:8, Jer 31:35-36, etc...and we wonder how we can explain away the fact that Jesus Himself clearly stated in Matt 15:24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. How is this possible if there is no more Israel? --BeWISE]

But praise be to God! A new and better way was now available for approaching the Unapproachable Almighty. The One crucified, whose death permanently replaced the yearly sacrifice of animals, became the perfect mediator between humankind and God. He is the high priest who entered into the presence of God once and for all time. He replaced the human high priest and now sits in the very presence of the Almighty, not just in His manifested presence in the temple. The people - you and I - may now enter into God's presence through the mediating authority of Jesus Christ! He alone can be our advocate; there is no other way, just as there was no other way for the Israelites except through the high priest and the animal sacrifice once a year in the temple.

Do you see why the rebuilding of the temple would be a blasphemous slap to God's face - an insult to His infinite wisdom and mercy? It would say to Him, "We don't want your merciful provision for our forgiveness. We want to return to the system of animal sacrifices and high priests and harsh rituals and...!" Incredibly, this is exactly what many Christians want for the Jews, and it has to be the worst kind of "anti-Semitism!" Who in their right minds would want a human father whose forgiveness depended on a series of cold, impersonal acts rather than a loving father who exclaimed, "Son - Daughter - I forgive your disobedience because I love you! That's what God has done by sending His only begotten Son to die in our place. Those of you who believe that Jews have a separate way to God-that His plan of salvation is different for them - are not only ignorant of the Bible, you have abdicated your responsibility and privilege of offering the only way possible to reach God. Your belief in this matter is anti-Semitic!

Returning now to the beginning of this article, we see that it doesn't matter whether Ashkenazim Jews are descended from Turko-Slavic (non-Semitic) stock or not, because all Jews are without a temple and therefore without access to God unless they accept His gracious mercy through Messiah (Christ) Jesus. We hope and pray that they may do so, and we believe that our attitude is far more loving and kind toward them than the Christians who lead them to believe otherwise. We realize, of course, that most Jews resent being asked to believe that Jesus was Messiah; some of them become downright hostile. We regret this but we have no control over their emotions. Shalom.


Return to Table of Contents

THE CHILDREN AT OKLAHOMA CITY WERE MORE PRECIOUS THAN THE CHILDREN AT WACO

As we watched the various TV coverage of the carnage at Oklahoma City, we noted the lamentation made over the loss of the children. That's as it should be. But our minds went back to the coverage of the Waco holocaust and the children who were burned to death there. It didn't seem quite the same. Somehow, the children at Waco were associated with the adult "social misfits" and, though not openly stated, were assigned lesser importance than those at Oklahoma City. Perhaps we missed it, but we didn't see as much grieving by the media for the Waco children. Could it be because the children there were victimized by officialdom while the ones at Oklahoma City were victimized by "right wing extremists"? In other words, the crime allegedly committed by "extremists" without badges was vastly worse than the crime committed by "extremists" with badges! Once again, the ugly head of hypocrisy in both government and media is reared high.
Return to Table of Contents

NEWS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED

Smyrna learned recently from a friend in the conservative publishing field that there were two explosions at Oklahoma City, not just one. We quickly telephoned the University of Oklahoma and talked to Dr. Ray Brown, geologist at the seismology lab. He confirmed that two clear, separate events were registered on two seismometers, each at a different location. The first explosion occurred at 9:02 a.m. and the second one 11-16 seconds later. They were of equal magnitude. What does this mean?

We posed the question to a lawyer and to a federal law enforcement officer. The lawyer hypothesized that a boiler or gas main could have exploded. The federal law enforcement officer said that it could possibly have been the detonating device. But these would not be equal in strength. Other information coming in indicates that something is terribly amiss. The truth may lie much deeper than this.


Return to Table of Contents

Jesse Jackson

Here is the infamous quote attributed to Jesse Jackson by John Pekkanen in Life mag 11/21/69 p.68: "Jackson talks about himself at these meetings. Once he told of his days as a waiter at the Jack Tar Hotel in his home town of Greenville, S.C. Just before leaving the kitchen he would spit into the food of white patrons he hated and then smilingly serve it to them. He did this, he said, 'because it gave me psychological gratification.' "
Return to Table of Contents

Here's How It Works, Folks!

Back in July of 1993 Smyrna published an article entitled, Police Agencies and ADL Control. It revealed how influence is peddled from the liberals/leftists right into the minds of police officers on selected subjects - officers who are conservatives on most things. As an example of the tentacles reaching into law enforcement, we reviewed an article in a magazine called Police Marksman, a magazine published by Gulf States Distributors in Montgomery, Alabama that sells police equipment. The article was entitled, Apocalypse, Now? and centered on survivalists as potential "formidable foes". It condernned Posse Comitatus groups for believing "...in tax and law reform in the United States...PC members believe that the United States and state governments have strayed and do not represent the ideals on which the United States was founded. Because of these beliefs, many members are stockpiling arms, ammunition, destructive devices, food and supplies for what they see as the impending collapse of the United States and ongoing conflict between them and the authorities."

Is there any wonder that the police think of all "right wingers" as dangerous? They have been programmed by the liberals and leftists. Note that the article used the term "destructive devices" which could range anywhere from firecrackers to atom bombs! But more than that, Police Marksman condemned survivalist Americans for believing that government has strayed and needs tax and law reform. Imagine that! Why, honey chile - our gub'ment don' need improvin' for hev'ns sake, we gettin long jes fine!

Only liberals/leftists believe that our socialist government is "jes fine". No, we retract that statement - they would like more socialism. And because our schools haven't taught the Constitution correctly for two generations, law enforcement officers are just as ignorant about good government as anyone else.

The liberal media at all levels have away at "right wingers" for many years. When J.F.K was assassinated in 1963, the major news sources immediately blamed right wing extremists. Well, they got egg on their faces because Lee Harvey Oswald was a left wing extremist! It doesn't matter whether you believe he I killed Kennedy or not, the point is that the media jumped on the "right wingers". So - when the federal building was bombed in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, the media had a field day with "right wing extremists". And the masses, including the police, who have been conditioned for years, now hate "right wingers" even more.

But let us distinguish between "right wingers" and "right-wingers". There are those who do not hate anyone - not Jews, not blacks, not anyone. They simply are vigorously opposed to the socialist-fascist agenda. Many of them are Christians and many are not. They abhor violence, except for the right to defend themselves in legitimate circumstances. They support good law enforcement but are unhappy with the influence that the socialists-fascists have on the leadership of law enforcement agencies.

On the other hand, there are those who are identified in the "right-wing" as extreme activists who include some form of violence in their agenda. Smyrna knows little about them, except that some of them apparently are uneducated and rather witless in their actions. We don't know if they are tools of the left-wing or not. Remember, socialist-communist technique calls for its own opposition, even to the point of physical confrontation.


Return to Table of Contents

Guess What?

Charles Leslie Dees is head of the Gulf States Distributors which sells police equipment. He also publishes the Police Marksman magazine, and he is the brother of Morris Dees, head of the notoriously left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center, both in Montgomery, Alabama. Morris Dees recently testified at Senate Judiciary Committee meeting on the desirability of monitoring and restricting the "right-wingers" and of stricter gun controls.
Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Ave.
Montgomery, AL 36104

Return to Table of Contents

WHY NOT ADOPT A NEW PERSPECTIVE?

Let's look at a different approach to the categories of right-wing and left-wing. The media and allies place all those who are patriots, constitutionalists, conservatives and fascists on the right of the political spectrum. The liberals, leftists, socialists and communists are placed on the opposite end of the spectrum. Is this view accurate? We believe not.

Since the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and since it requires limited government and maximum liberty, it represents a balance between law and freedom. Its adherents should be placed in the center of the political spectrum. These folk today are so-called conservatives and are represented by, for example, Pat Buchanan, Howard Phillips, Bob Dornan and millions of Americans - probably a majority.

On the left of the political spectrum are the socialists, communists, fascists, liberals, leftists, because they believe in social programs by government that require maximum control over the people. Note that communists and fascists are on the same end of the spectrum, which is definitely contrary to popular opimon created by the liberals-leftists.

This model leaves one end of the spectrum empty. Who belongs there? That spot is reserved for the anarchists who want no government at all. That view is unworkable, however, because anarchy is unstable and leads to total government which is tyranny. See the political spectrum line below:

o


Return to Table of Contents
President Bill Clinton and Janet Reno have declared their desire to shut down all those who publish derogatory material against the government be cause, they say, such journalism encourages the violent "right-wing extremists" to commit crimes. Their proposal, of course, is unconstitutional. We believe that the alternative media have been largely responsible for the level of dissatisfaction in America with unlawful bureaucracy. Furthermore, the mass media would like to see us eliminated because they no longer have a total monopoly. We have, in some measure, performed an end run around them, and they don't like that. It is certainly ironic that Mr. Clinton is so riled about the loss of life at Oklahoma City while there are more than twenty people dead who were in some way connected to his unholy activities in Arkansas. In his speech at the commencement exercises at Michigan State University he played the "right wing" sing-song for all it was worth. He has been able to score points with people that would otherwise not agree, all because of the tragedy in Oklahoma. Whether Tim McVeigh and other so-called "right wing" extremists were responsible for the dastardly deed there, the fact is that the event played right into the hands of the enemies of constitutionalists. It appears to us that one of three things happened, or a combination thereof: (l) Stupid anti-government extremists set the bomb; (2) Agents provocateurs encouraged it from within; (3) Leftists or government forces did it to blame the "right-wing". Who stands to profit the most?
Return to Table of Contents

Talmud Tales of a Roman Holocaust

Gittin 57b (p. 266): Claims 4 billion Jews were kllled by the Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a (pp. 269-270): Claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans.

Of course there were not 16 million Jews in the entire world, much less 16 million Jewish children or 4 billion Jews.

[In 1919 former Gov. Glynn of NY claimed that 6 million Jews were in danger of a holocaust. THAT WAS AFTER WORLD WAR I! And they ask us to believe them now?]


Return to Top
o Back to Apostasy
o Go to June 1995


Courtesy and care of: Be Wise As Serpents BBS
International Christian Educational Services
bewise@pixi.com